OPGW State Evaluation Method Based on MSIF and QPSO-DQN in Icing Scenarios

OPGW State Evaluation Method Based on MSIF and QPSO-DQN in Icing Scenarios

Zhigang Yan, Min Cui, Xiao Ma, Jinrui Wang, Zhihui Zhang, Lidong Yang
DOI: 10.4018/IJITSA.343318
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

A new OPGW state evaluation method based on Multi-Source Information Fusion (MSIF) and Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization & Deep Q-learning (QPSO-DQN) is proposed. Firstly, using MSIF to integrate and unify historical data and real-time monitoring data of OPGW, more comprehensive and accurate OPGW status information was obtained. Then, utilizing the advantages of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm DQN in handling highly nonlinear problems, various influencing factors related to the operation of OPGW were addressed. Finally, DQN was improved by introducing the QPSO optimization algorithm, which transformed the Q-value function solving in DQN into a function fitting problem and used QPSO as an intelligent agent to fit the function, achieving accurate evaluation of the OPGW operating status. The simulation experiment results show that the proposed method has the highest accuracy in ice weight detection, temperature detection, frequency detection, and optical power detection on the same dataset, reaching 98.85%, 98.97%, 98.13%, and 98.97%, respectively.
Article Preview
Top

Opgw State Evaluation In Icing Scenarios Based On Msif And Qpso-Dqn

With the rapid development of modern society and the explosive growth of information, communication networks have become an important component of national infrastructure. In this field, optical ground wire (OPGW), as a unique type of optical cable, has attracted much attention due to its dual functions of both overhead ground wire for power lines and fiber optic communication (Xia et al., 2023; Sun et al., 2021; Marie et al., 2020). OPGW is a composite optical cable that wraps optical fibers in overhead ground wires. It uses power overhead ground wires as external protection for optical cables, while providing grounding protection and electromagnetic interference resistance for power lines (Nguyen & Nguyen, 2020; Mohammed & Daham, 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Due to its unique structure, OPGW has many advantages:

  • 1.

    Due to their structural characteristics, OPGW optical cables are highly reliable and can effectively avoid communication line failures caused by lightning strikes and short-circuit currents in traditional power communication systems (Peng et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2020).

  • 2.

    OPGW optical cables are suitable for installation on power lines of various voltage levels and are easy to construct and install (Zhang et al., 2022; Wang & Li, 2022).

  • 3.

    OPGW optical cables can withstand large stresses and have strong resistance to strong winds, ice, and other factors (Wang et al., 2020a; Wang et al., 2020b).

  • 4.

    OPGW optical cables have a long service life, generally ranging from 25 to 30 years, often more (Martín-López et al., 2021; Qin et al., 2021).

OPGW is generally designed and installed simultaneously with overhead ground wires of transmission lines and can be installed in one go. On the premise of maintaining all the performance and functions of the original overhead ground wire unchanged, optical fibers are added to open up high-performance optical transmission channels, making it both lightning protection and communication functions (Wang et al., 2022; Lalam et al., 2021). As seen above, OPGW has good electrical, mechanical, and optical transmission performance and has been widely used in power grids in recent years. Most newly built transmission lines use OPGW as overhead ground wire, which undertakes important tasks in power communication (Lin et al., 2021; Rao et al., 2021). Compared to overhead transmission lines, OPGW towers are higher than transmission lines, closer to thunderstorms, and more susceptible to lightning strikes. During normal operation, OPGW has no load current, and the wire diameter is smaller than that of the conductor, which makes OPGW more severely covered with ice under the same meteorological conditions. Due to the lower mechanical strength of OPGW compared to conductors, it is more susceptible to damage and more severe (Ding et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2022).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 17: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 16: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 15: 3 Issues (2022)
Volume 14: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 13: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 12: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 11: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 10: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 9: 2 Issues (2016)
Volume 8: 2 Issues (2015)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2014)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2013)
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2012)
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2011)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2010)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2009)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2008)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing