Opportunities for the Circular Economy in Smart Cities: The Role of Digital Technology

Opportunities for the Circular Economy in Smart Cities: The Role of Digital Technology

Ron Schipper (P2 Project Management, Rossum, Netherlands) and Gilbert Silvius (LOI University of Applied Sciences, Leiderdorp, Netherlands & University of Johannesburg, South Africa)
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 24
DOI: 10.4018/IJISSC.2019100102


Our current global economy is based on the linear flow of material and energy at a speed faster than earth can regenerate its services. A logical answer is reversing this into a circular economy, implemented through Circular Business Models (CBM). While cities count for the majority of current and future inhabitants, consumption and negative externalities people presume the CE should play an important role in coping with its challenges. To maintain urban livability, there is another emerging city strategy. That is to integrate technology in the urban domain and make a city “smart.” This development questions how digitization can also leverage CBM in the smart city area. However, little research is known on this topic. This article therefore studies the relationship between the circular economy and a circular smart city by exploring digital technology as a common variable. The authors first conceptualize the possibilities to enhance CBM by digital technology and then apply concept mapping to determine if and which CBM have greatest possibility to flourish in a circular smart city context.
Article Preview


A major issue in our current global system is the linear flow of material and energy between nature and human economy (Korhonen et al., 2018a) at a speed faster than earth can regenerate its services. The subsequent depletion of our natural resources will be worsened by the significant growth of world population and people moving to cities (https://www.unfpa.org/migration). This migration will improve the lives of many to middle class standards synchronously causing an increase in the per capita consumption. Subsequently earth is reaching it planetary boundaries (Broman and Robert, 2017) and the global natural eco-system is becoming smaller (Korhonen et al., 2018a; Broman and Robert, 2017) in seize and volume. A logical answer to this challenge is reversing the linear model: a circular economy (CE) matching the ecosystem service cycles (Korhonen, 2018a). The CE is implemented through Circular Business Models (CBM).

We observe an enormous increase in circular initiatives but reviewing the literature on this topic also reveals several challenges. A 2018 report released in Davos during the World Economic Forum (Wit et al., 2018) stated that only 9% of the economy can be classified as circular. Most of the circular economy (CE) initiatives are small scale, non-complex projects often only in conjunction with a company’s suppliers. Many companies that are publicly categorized as circular, only implement several elements of the CE (Jonker, 2016b). The sharing platform-economy, such as Uber and AirBnb, highlight several positive attributes of the circular economy such as using over-capacity, but they tend to push out their negative side effects from their value proposition thereby not creating multiple positive value streams (Jonker, 2016a). Nußholz (2017) mentions that it isn’t clear how the CBM actually differ from LBM and Korhonen (2018b) even classifies the CE as essentially contested. The theoretical foundations on sustainable and circular business models have not been established yet.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Open Access Articles
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing