Organization and Management Past to Present: Applicability to Practice in the Modern Enterprise

Organization and Management Past to Present: Applicability to Practice in the Modern Enterprise

Thomas Joseph
Copyright: © 2020 |Pages: 10
DOI: 10.4018/IJBSA.20200401.oa
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This article examined the historical evolution of organization and management theories and their applicability to practice in modern enterprise. Management and organizational theories each add something to the awareness of what managers ought to do. The contemporary approaches of management and organization theory draw upon the historical ideals of classical management and organization theories. Managers must, therefore, value the true concepts of contemporary organizational and management theories that frame the construct and decision-making processes of their particular organizations. Without a doubt, managers who make considerable efforts to transform these theories (classical and contemporary) into reality and practicality could increase productivity more than those who choose to ignore the value of these theories.
Article Preview
Top

The Evolution Of Management And Organization Theory

The evolution of management and organization emerged around the final decades of the nineteenth century. Hatch and Cunliffe (2006) proposed that the prehistoric period of organization and management theory was formed by two fundamental thoughts namely, sociological and managerial. These two schools of thought focused respectively on the organizational formality and influence within a society as well as the viable predicaments that managers deal with within those environments. According to Perrow (1973), the distinctive interests embodied by sociological and managerial thoughts created tension in organization and management theory relative to both theory and practice. Sociological and managerial ideas represent the basis of scientific management theory.

The Work of Adam Smith

According to George (1968), the notable economist Adam Smith was one of the first to pronounce a theory that elucidates effective production in work practices that were systematically organized. Smith (1937) compared the relational performances of two dissimilar manufacturing methods and discovered that factory workers who specialized in single/distinct task or limited tasks had greater performance than those who performed multiple tasks for making a specific product (for example, pins). He recognized that higher productivity and efficiency resulted from job specialization. Job specialization denotes or mandates the division of labour among workers in order to improve work efficiency and improve organizational performance. Division of labour outlines the allocation of responsibilities and tasks in an organization (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006). Smith concluded that organizational managers should control and organize the organization’s work process in order to capitalize on getting the most out of the advantages of division of labour as well as job specialization.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 5: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 4: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 3: 1 Issue (2022)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2020)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing