The Outcome of Knowledge Process for Customer of Jordanian Companies on the Achievement of Customer Knowledge Retention

The Outcome of Knowledge Process for Customer of Jordanian Companies on the Achievement of Customer Knowledge Retention

Amine Nehari-Talet (King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia), Samer Alhawari (Applied Science Private University, Jordan) and Haroun Alryalat (The Arab Academy for Banking and Financial Sciences, Amman, Jordan)
Copyright: © 2010 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/jkm.2010103003
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


Organizations have increasingly recognized the importance of managing customer relationships, and Knowledge Management (KM) from the perspective of a process approaches assure positive impact on customer retention. Many organizations are turning to Customer Relationship Management (CRM) to better serve customers and facilitate closer relationships. This paper investigates how Knowledge Process for customers is used in practice by Jordanian companies to achieve Customer Knowledge Retention. The current practice is based on the data collected from 156, randomly drawn and reported from a survey of CRM applications and evaluation of CRM analytical functions provided by three software business solution companies working in the CRM area, and four companies that used the CRM system. Based on data collected from the companies, results from the analysis indicated that the knowledge process for customers had a positive effect on customer knowledge retention. The paper also verified the hypotheses of the effect of knowledge processes for customers on customer retention. The findings shed light on the potential relationship between the knowledge processes for customers and customer retention. It also provides guidance for the Information Technology (IT) industry as to how an analytical knowledge process for customers should be taken into account in developing countries to support to achieve customer knowledge retention due to cultural, social and educational differences.
Article Preview

2. Literature Review

KM, as a discipline, is designed to provide strategy, process, and technology to increase organizational learning (Satyadas et al., 2001). The various system designs attempt to capture and capitalize on the existing explicit, implicit and, in some cases, tacit knowledge of organizations. This emphasis on technology hides the range of knowledge available in an organization and processes that facilitates the flow of knowledge. Organizations must develop an integrative approach to KM that covers all potential components of knowledge and leverages specific components strategically aligned to their business objectives. In addition, KM is not something new; it is going to be something tangible and, in other words, there is a type of revolution on this topic today. Therefore it can be useful for the success of CRM activity. As a concept, it is one of the important factors for achievement of customer knowledge retention in the long term. Study of the KM process is important for the organization to validate the objective. Therefore, CRM process can be considered as knowledge oriented process with the characteristics of knowledge intensity and process complexity (Lin et al., 2006). Customer knowledge managers seek opportunities for partnering with their customers as equal co-creators of organizational value. This is also in stark contrast to the desire to maintain and nurture an existing customer base (Gibbert et al., 2002). Goh (2005) describes KM as an expertise that is widely recognized as having a significant impact on business performance. It is an approach that is used to capture, create, and apply knowledge to make the CRM process successful (Alryalat et al., 2007). The literature shows that managers focus on how to produce growth for the corporation through acquiring new customers and through engaging in an active and value-creating dialogue with them, and are much less concerned with customer retention information. Furthermore, it has been maintained that CRM and KM have been gaining recently wide interest in business environment (Gebert et al., 2002).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing