Ownership Concentration, Family Control, and Auditor Choice: Evidence From Iranian Companies

Ownership Concentration, Family Control, and Auditor Choice: Evidence From Iranian Companies

Mohammad Amoonejad, Mehdi Safari Geraily
DOI: 10.4018/IJABIM.2018040104
(Individual Articles)
No Current Special Offers


The present study investigates the relationship between ownership concentration and family control, with the choice of high-quality auditors. For this purpose, a sample of 94 firms listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2011 to 2015 were selected and the research hypotheses were tested using logistic regression model. The findings indicate that there is a significant positive relationship between ownership concentration and the choice of high-quality audit firms. However, there was not any evidence of a significant relationship between family ownership and a choice of high quality audit firms. The findings, in addition to filling the Empirical gap in this area can be useful for investors, the Tehran Stock Exchange and other stakeholders.
Article Preview

2. Theoretical Foundations And Hypothesis Development

There have been various points of view regarding ownership concentration in the accounting literature. On the one hand, based on active monitoring hypothesis, it can be argued that the major shareholders are long-term-oriented investors who have great motivation and ability to monitor managers actively (Lin & Liu, 2009). On the other hand, proponents of self-interest hypothesis believe that it is more likely that major investors take advantage of special interests, such as access to private information that could be used for trading purposes. When ownership is concentrated, it seems plausible that major shareholders use their controlling rights in order to gain self-interest and exploit minor shareholders. Based on this reasoning, Darmady (2016) found that in companies with concentrated ownership structure, agency problems often occur between major and minor shareholders, because in these companies, major shareholders seek their self-benefit at the expense of minor shareholders. These issues lead to information asymmetry in the capital market. In such conditions, the demand for high-quality independent auditors as a monitoring tool is enhanced. Thus, regarding the above, the first hypothesis is presented as follows:

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 2 Issues (2022)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing