Performance Accretion in Delay Compensation of Networked Control System Using Markov Approach-Based Randomness Estimation in Smith Predictor

Performance Accretion in Delay Compensation of Networked Control System Using Markov Approach-Based Randomness Estimation in Smith Predictor

Ratish Kumar, Rajiv Kumar, Madhav Ji Nigam
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 17
DOI: 10.4018/IJSDA.302634
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

By the second decade of the 21st century, there has been a multi-faceted technological development in the field of networked control system (NCS). This progression in NCS has not only revealed its significant applications in various areas but has also unveiled various difficulties associated with it that hampered the operations of networked control system. Network-induced delays are issues that promote many other issues like packet dropout and brevity in bandwidth utilization. In this research article, network-induced delay has been curtailed by using the harmony between Smith predictor and Markov approach. The error estimation of the Smith predictor controller used for the simulation is carried out through a Markov approach which allows the control of the system to operate smoothly by optimizing the control signal. To implement the proposed method, the authors have simulated a third order system in Matlab/Simulink software.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

In today’s perspective the development of science and technology has fetched a wide change in the field of control system. Now-a-days, the control system is not only confined within the structure of the institutional framework, but is performing tasks globally and the network is rooted to do so. This mutual form of control system with network is called networked control system (NCS), elucidated by Yang, (2006), Liu & Wang (2008), and Chow & Gupta, (2009). Wherein, Antsaklis & Baillieul, (2007), and Bemporad et., al., (2010) described that Control is established through the network on the control system components such as reference input, control signals and the output-feedback of the plant is shared through sensors over the network (Kizito et. al., 2020 and Guo et. al., 2010). Networked control systems have been emerged as a major technique for regulating, directing, and commanding modern scientific and industrial systems in a broader form relatively than a conventional control system. Networked control systems have provided a wide variety of effective amenities at the ground level such as working up the complexity of wiring, extending work efficiency, ease of system operation, upgradation and maintenance, low cost and reduced space and improves efficiency and accessibility with reduced power requirements (Zelinka & Amadei, 2019; Antsaklis, 2005, and Gao et. al., 2008). Adapted challenges in designing networked control systems encourage all researchers to work in this area such as delay in receiving control signals and output signals, packet dropout, and inappropriate use of channel bandwidth (Yu & Zhang, 2008). Apart from the encouraging approaches of NCS there are certain limitations which constantly gain the attention of the researchers across the globe, like network-induced delay, signal quantization, narrowing bandwidth, packet dropout, communication security are few issues of prime concern (Ghabi et. al., 2018 and Zhang et. al., 2015).

In the past few years, the researchers are constantly trying to improve the NCS sector through various approaches and algorithms. Network-induced time delays performs a significant role for the deprived performance of networked control systems, one of the main reasons differentiating system instability (Wang et. al., 2007, and Zhang et. al., 2016). The various kinds of delay in a networked control system can be illustrated through Fig. 1, representing state dynamics of control system can be defined by state equation of the system as:

IJSDA.302634.m01
(1) where the state vector IJSDA.302634.m02, is IJSDA.302634.m03, input vector, IJSDA.302634.m04 is IJSDA.302634.m05, square matrix A & B have dimensions as IJSDA.302634.m06 & IJSDA.302634.m07 respectively. IJSDA.302634.m08is the total delay in the system that can be limited as IJSDA.302634.m09 such that IJSDA.302634.m10. Similarly, system output can be expressed as integration of state variables and inputs as:
IJSDA.302634.m11
(2) where, output vector y is IJSDA.302634.m12, output matrix C is IJSDA.302634.m13 and D is transmission matrix having dimensions IJSDA.302634.m14.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 12: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 11: 5 Issues (2022)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2012)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing