A Rule-Based Approach to Automatic Service Composition

A Rule-Based Approach to Automatic Service Composition

Maria J. Santofimia (University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain), Xavier del Toro (University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain), Felix J. Villanueva (University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain), Jesus Barba (University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain), Francisco Moya (University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain) and Juan Carlos Lopez (University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain)
Copyright: © 2012 |Pages: 13
DOI: 10.4018/jaci.2012010102
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


The incapability to foresee or react to all the events that take place in a specific environment supposes an important handicap for Ambient Intelligence systems, expected to be self-managed, proactive, and goal-driven. Endowing such systems with capabilities to understand and reason about context seems like a promising solution to overcome this hitch. Supported on the service-oriented paradigm, composing rather than combining services provides a reasonable mean to implement versatile systems. This paper describes how systems for Ambient Intelligence can be improved by combining automatic service composition and reasoning capabilities upon a distributed middleware framework.
Article Preview

1. Introduction

Self-management, pro-activeness, dynamism and goal-driven are some of the most challenging requirements that have to be faced when developing systems for Ambient Intelligence. Indeed, devising a strategy to address these issues has been one of the main concerns for researchers in the field for the last decades. The majority of the proposed solutions simply address isolated aspects of the overall problem. Agent-based approaches are proposed as a mean to deal with specific and repetitive tasks, most of them targeted to the disabled people (Moraitis & Spanoudakis, 2007). Agent-based solutions have also been used to model the environment as a group of distributed services, provided by heterogeneous devices, as in Cabri, Ferrari, Leonardi, and Zambonelli (2005). Planning approaches have been proposed as a mean to enact goal-oriented behaviors (Amigoni, Gatti, Pinciroli, & Roveri, 2005) while addressing device heterogeneity. Solutions based on supporting dynamic service composition have also been widely considered and implemented by means of different technologies, as described in Urbieta, Barrutieta, Parra, and Uribarren (2008). Nevertheless, adopting any of these approaches in an isolated manner is far from being the solution to address the ambiguity, uncertainty and incompleteness that characterize context information.

Systems for Ambient Intelligence have to deal with the service dynamism derived from the device mobility that characterizes such context. This feature makes unfeasible to count on pre-coded responses to ambient events since the available services cannot be known beforehand. Even when knowing a static set of services always available, the system response capabilities should not be constrained to these available services. On the contrary, responses should be automatically composed out of the available services, and based on a general description of what is required.

Automatic service composition has already been addressed from the web services perspective, as described in Medjahed and Bouguettaya (2005) or Maamar, Mostefaoui, and Yahyaoui (2005). However, although labeled as service composition, it is more appropriate to refer to this approach as service combination. It is important to remark the difference between service composition and combination. When composing services, it does not suffice with connecting a service output with a service input, as it is described in a static recipe. This task falls into what we consider service combination. Meanwhile, service composition requires the understanding of what services are capable of, and when required, the assignment of the service to a different purpose than originally intended. Nevertheless, supporting automatic service composition involves a deep understanding of the service semantics and the domain knowledge.

Domain models are intended to fill the gap between the perceived information and the meaning it has. Among the many different context modeling techniques (Strang & Linnhoff-Popien, 2004) ontologies stand out to be the more compelling approach to address domain models for Ambient Intelligence (Wang, Zhang, Gu, & Pung, 2004). The importance of providing an ontology for Ambient Intelligence is twofold. On the one hand, it unifies the vocabulary used to describe the domain knowledge. Moreover, interoperability among the different architectural elements of an Ambient Intelligence system draws on this unified vocabulary. On the other hand, providing an ontology about the domain knowledge makes it possible the generation of large bodies of knowledge logically related (Taylor, Matuszek, Klimt, & Witbrock, 2007; Mascardi, Locoro, & Rosso, 2010).

The work presented here provides a context ontology for supporting, not just the domain modeling but the reasoning and service composition tasks. Opting for a context reasoning technique over others is not easy, due to the wide range of available approaches (Bikakis, Patkos, Antoniou, & Plexousakis, 2007). The strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches depend on the target context and the technique used for context modeling. The proposal presented here, entrusts the context reasoning and inference tasks to a rule-based engine, mainly due to the proved performance of widely known engine rules, as well as for being compliant with ontology languages.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Open Access Articles
Volume 13: 6 Issues (2022): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing