Screening Job Candidates With Social Media: A Manipulation of Disclosure Requests

Screening Job Candidates With Social Media: A Manipulation of Disclosure Requests

John R. Drake, Christopher P. Furner
Copyright: © 2020 |Pages: 22
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.2020100104
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

With the proliferation of social media, job candidate screening and evaluation professionals have new avenues to gather information regarding job candidates. Job candidates recognize that recruiters will examine their social media, and tailor their profiles to foster a positive impression. However, recent popular press news suggests that some employers are taking social media screening to more invasive levels. This study seeks to evaluate how job candidates respond to social media screening from recruiters. Using a scenario-based experiment with 290 subjects, the authors tested relationships between candidate characteristics and trust in the recruiter as well as hesitancy to accept an offer. This research found that under all conditions, trust reduces hesitancy to accept the offer and that age reduces trust in the company. Further, this article found differences in the relationships between privacy protection competence, social media production and trusting stance on trust in the company based on the level of social media screening.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

According to Aral, Dellarocas, and Godes (2013, p. 3), Social Networking Sites (SNS) “represent one of the most transformative impacts of information technology on business, both within and outside firm boundaries.” SNS are primary among the technologies which comprise Web 2.0, which has empowered non-technical users to create web-based content with only minimal effort and no financial cost. The use of SNS has grown substantially over the past decade (Dewan & Ramaprasad, 2014; Pham, Tran, Thipwong, & Huang, 2019), and as SNS use continues to grow, new uses for the information that they contain are being discovered.

Human Resource (HR) professionals are among those turning to SNS in order to augment the effectiveness of their efforts. While job recruiters have been using SNS to attract potential employees for some time (Gibbs, MacDonald, & MacKay, 2015), HR professionals are increasingly using SNS to screen candidates. This raises a number of interesting research questions related to privacy concern and trust formation among job candidates (Suen, 2018).

According to the Bureau of National Affairs (2000), the top three priorities of HR professionals has been the recruiting, selection and placing of new employees for over 15 years. Recruiters are faced with a complex search and optimization problem under uncertainty: they must attempt to match the skill sets of job candidates with the skill needs of their organization, while constrained by their ability to attract candidates and constrained by uncertainty about the ability and motivation of any candidate to perform the activities which the organization needs to be performed.

While the recruiters are likely to have a strong sense of the requirements of the jobs which they are attempting to fill, the majority of the uncertainty that they face is in the ability and motivation of each candidate (Furner & George, 2009). In the interest of securing offers, job candidates endeavor to present themselves in the most positive light possible, often times engaging in deception (Weiss & Feldman, 2006). Increasingly, recruiters are using the social media profiles and activities of candidates as a means to reduce uncertainty about the candidates (Brown & Vaughn, 2011). Through SNS, recruiters may be able to determine if the job candidate spends their free time studying, volunteering, or engaging in recreational behavior. Recruiters may also observe the relative stability of the candidate’s personal relationships, their use of drugs and alcohol, or their proclivity to use language which might not reflect well on the company. Indeed, a few stories have indicated that recruiters have even gone so far as to request the SNS passwords of individuals applying for jobs (e.g. O'Dell, 2012).

Job candidates are also faced with a complex optimization problem under uncertainty. They attempt to elicit offers from multiple companies, then make tradeoffs between compensation, potential career growth opportunities, and potential job satisfaction. Assessing potential career growth and satisfaction is wrought with uncertainty, and as such, job candidates form attitudes about the employer based on their limited interactions with recruiters and managers. In this scenario, trust becomes a factor of primary importance to the job candidate, as it influences their proclivity to accept or decline a job offer (Celani, Deutsch-Salamon, & Singh, 2008). Given the dynamic and evolving nature of SNS use by individuals and organizations, it is no surprise that research on the area is still immature. Indeed, Kluemper, Davison, Cao, and Wu (2015 p.61) contend that the study of the topic “has been substantially outpaced by organizational practice.” As such, Kluemper et al. (2015) directly called for a research effort devoted to understanding the use of SNS in job candidate screening. This study represents a first step in answering that call.

Our research question is motivated by the lack of understanding about the effect of recruiter collection of SNS information about job candidates on the candidate’s trust in the employer and willingness to accept a job offer (Drake, Hall, Becton, & Posey, 2016).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing