Seismic Response of Buildings Resting on Soil Isolated With EPS Geofoam Buffer

Seismic Response of Buildings Resting on Soil Isolated With EPS Geofoam Buffer

Sreya M. V., Jayalekshmi B. R., Katta Venkataramana
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/IJGEE.298987
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The present study deals with analyzing the efficacy of EPS (Epoxy Polystyrene) geofoam buffer as a soil-isolation medium to reduce the seismic energy transferred and, thereby to reduce the dynamic response of buildings under earthquake induced loads. Finite element simulation of the transient response of an integrated soil isolation-building system in which, buildings resting on raft foundation in medium dense sand beds, with and without soil-isolation mechanism has been carried out using a recorded accelerogram of El Centro earthquake. Four sets of three-dimensional buildings (one, two, three and four-storey) of single bay moment resisting concrete frames have been considered for the analysis. The EPS geofoam buffer of various thicknesses was placed at different depths below the raft foundation. The results under field-scale conditions indicate that soil isolation provided by the EPS geofoam buffer substantially reduces the earthquake energy transmission to the superstructure during a strong earthquake.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Earthquakes prove to be the most damaging disasters today, affecting millions of buildings almost every year across the world. Either structures may be built to withstand the disruptive effects of earthquakes in order to provide healthy living environments, or seismic isolators may be provided to reduce these effects. There are different soil reinforcement materials used in the past inn order to increase the bearing capacity of soil and also to reduce the settlement in soil etc. In the last few decades, a significant amount of experimental research has been conducted to investigate the vibration screening problem. For example, Barkan and McNeill et al. were the first to report on actual vibration isolation applications. Here the material, EPS geofoam, its application as a vibration isolator is discussed in this study. EPS geofoam is available in numerous material types that can be chosen by the designer for a specific application. Its service life is comparable to other construction materials and it will retain its physical properties under engineered conditions of use. The lifetime of geofoam is about 70 to 100 years. The use of EPS typically translates into benefits to construction schedules and lowers the overall cost of construction because it is easy to handle during construction, often without the need for special equipment, and is unaffected by occurring weather conditions.

The generic term 'Geofoam' was proposed by Horvath (1992) to describe all the rigid plastic foams that are used in geotechnical applications. Later, the definition of geofoam was broadened to include any cellular material or product created by an expansion process. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam has been used as a geotechnical reinforcement material since 1960s. Because of its excellent mechanical properties such as light-weight fill, pressure reduction, noise and vibration damping, thermal insulation, and compressible inclusions, EPS geofoam has been widely used in geotechnical engineering (Aytekin, 1997; Zou and Leo, 1998; Horvath, 1997; Stark et al., 2004). Geofoam technology has since been used as a super light-weight embankment material for roadway and rail construction in Europe, Asia, and the United States (Frydenlund and Aabe, 1996; Miki, 1996; Bartlett et al., 2000, 2012a; Farnsworth et al., 2008; Riad et al., 2004; Snow et al., 2010).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 2 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing