Article Preview
TopIntroduction
Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm has been around since almost two decades but its meaning has undergone significant changes. Initially, the term was though as a way to link supply chain with radio frequency identification (RFID) (Ashton, 2009). Nowadays, IoT vision is to connect to the Internet not only computers, tablets or smartphones but also other physical objects and devices surrounding us, such as sensors, actuators, etc. – which, through unique identifiers are able to interact with each other to reach common goals in everyday life like in environmental monitoring, e-health, domotics, or in automation and industrial manufacturing just to mention few (Atzori, 2010), (Giusto, 2010).
That would set up a triangle device – person - activity with relations drawn between people and devices. It should be further explored in order to infer important knowledge like are activities of people but also their devices. All of that needs meaning interpretation, which can be obtained by semantics. Therefore, using ontologies to describe the conceptualization of this certain domain is necessary. Some researchers argue that sensor networks are the most essential components of the IoT, with most of the sensors today deployed as wireless (Perera, 2014). According to a recent BBC report, the global market for sensors is expected to grow fast to almost double by 2021, with wireless sensor devices1 nearly triple its current market by 2021. Ericsson2 on the other side predicts that IoT sensors and devices are expected to exceed mobile phones as the largest category of connected devices in 2018. Hence, new emerging technologies such as WSNs (wireless sensor networks) are an imperative in this domain conceptualization. That may implicate adding new ontological constructs and constraints on top of the existing ontologies.
There is a standard, the Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) (Lefort, 2011), (Bröring, 2012), conceived by the Open Geospatial Consortium3 (OCG) that supports publication on the Web of (potentially heterogeneous) WSN related data following a single standard schema. WSN data may thus get accessed with ease via a single web, the so-called Web Enabled WSN (Rouached 2012) (Udayakumar, 2012), leading provisionally to lower cost and better-quality communication between sensors.
On the other side, there is an ever-growing vast amount of data from a diversity of domains being published as Linked Data (Bizer, 2009), (Lee, 2006), namely open semantically described and interlinked data that are made available for access through the Web. It may thus be easier and time effective to build applications using Linked Data. Moreover, applications may gain from new knowledge potentially derived from semantic descriptions including interlinks. As more open rich-in-semantics linked sensor data are published on the Web, best practices are evolving too, such as the proposed six step model to create and publish linked data (Hyland, 2011, Cygankia, 2014) and as well the best practices for publishing Linked Data published by World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)4.