Social Influence Online: A Tale of Gender Differences in the Effectiveness of Authority Cues

Social Influence Online: A Tale of Gender Differences in the Effectiveness of Authority Cues

Bradley M. Okdie (The Ohio State University at Newark, Newark, OH, USA), Rosanna E. Guadagno (The National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA), Petia K. Petrova (Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA) and Wyley B. Shreves (The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/ijicst.2013010102
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


This study examined the extent to which communicator salience manipulated by varying communication modes, authority-based social influence, and gender affect persuasion in online environments by utilizing a 2 by 2 between subjects design. Participants of the experiment were either presented with an authority-based influence attempt or no influence attempt. They then engaged in a persuasive interaction with a same-sex confederate via computer-mediated communication (CMC) or face-to-face. Results revealed that men in the Authority condition who interacted via CMC were more persuaded then men in the Peer condition who interacted via CMC. Additionally, men reported more confidence when interacting via CMC and reported that their decision was more influenced by the confederate online. Moreover, perceptions of the confederate varied by gender and communication mode. Analysis suggests that authority based influence tactics via CMC are more effective for men than for women.
Article Preview


The extent to which individuals interact and spend time online continues to grow. With the rise in time spent online, comes an increase in influence attempts occurring in online environments (Guadagno & Cialdini, 2005; Guadagno, Muscanell, Rice, & Roberts, 2013). Influence appeals have become normative in most online venues. For example, advertisements appear on web pages, social networking sites, in news feeds, and in email form. Past research provided information detailing the psychological processes and moderators for this influence when it occurs in a traditional face-to-face context (see Cialdini & Guadagno, 2005 for review). However, little is known about the process through which attitudes change when individuals are influenced while communicating online. With the advent of the Internet and the World Wide Web, a new communication medium for interpersonal influence has emerged. Over the years, the literature on new media effects and social influence has grown. However, few researchers examined how attitude change occurring face-to-face (FtF) may differ from attitude change when the communicator of the influence is less salient. The present investigation focuses on the impact of communicator salience, authority, and gender on persuasion in online contexts.

Online Communication

Research has identified four features that differentiate computer-mediated communication (CMC) from face-to-face (FtF) communication (McKenna & Bargh, 2000; Bargh & McKenna, 2004): the time and pace of interaction, the ability to be relatively anonymous, the attenuation of physical distance, and the reduced emphasis on physical appearance (McKenna, Green, & Gleason, 2002). These features may account for differences between FtF and CMC (Sproull & Kiesler, 1985; Walther, Anderson, & Park, 1994) in such domains as groups (Spears, Postmes, Lea, & Wolbert, 2002), work settings (Cummings, Butler, & Kraut, 2002), and relationship formation (Guadagno, Okdie, & Kruse, 2012; McKenna et al., 2002). Although scholars have investigated these differences across multiple domains, little research has examined how these attributes might affect social influence processes in an online environment with decreased communicator cues (for reviews, see Guadagno & Cialdini, 2005; Guadagno, in press). The decrease in the salience of communicator cues (i.e., the decrease in the importance of physical appearance) may affect the degree to which influence attempts are efficacious across differing media.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 11: 2 Issues (2021): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 10: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 1 Issue (2016)
Volume 5: 1 Issue (2015)
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing