Solving Multi-Objective Multicast Routing Problem Using a New Hybrid Approach

Solving Multi-Objective Multicast Routing Problem Using a New Hybrid Approach

Mohammed Mahseur, Abdelmadjid Boukra, Yassine Meraihi
Copyright: © 2018 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/IJAEC.2018100102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Multicast routing is the problem of finding the spanning tree of a set of destinations whose roots are the source node and its leaves are the set of destination nodes by optimizing a set of quality of service parameters and satisfying a set of transmission constraints. This article proposes a new hybrid multicast algorithm called Hybrid Multi-objective Multicast Algorithm (HMMA) based on the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA) to evaluate and classify the population in dominated solutions and non-dominated solutions. Dominated solutions are evolved by the Bat Algorithm, and non-dominated solutions are evolved by the Firefly Algorithm. Old and weak solutions are replaced by new random solutions by a process of mutation. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is able to find good Pareto optimal solutions compared to other algorithms.
Article Preview
Top

2. Background

The multi-objective multicast routing problem is a topical issue that has been the subject of very important research, this kind of optimization problems has attracted the attention of researchers in computer communication and operational research. Several meta-heuristics have been developed around this topic including Genetic Algorithms, Tabu Search, Variable Neighborhood Search, Simulated Annealing, Immune Systems, Particle Swarm Optimization, Ant Colonies…

Cui et al. (Cui, Lin, & Wei, 2003) proposed a routing approach based on a genetic algorithm and Pareto dominance, their approach optimizes three qualities of service parameters. The simulations show that the used modeling can found a set of non-dominated multicast trees with a good quality to approximate the Pareto front.

Crichingo and Barán (Crichigno & Barán, 2004) proposed a new multicast algorithm based on the SPEA algorithm optimizing simultaneously the cost of the tree, the maximum end-to-end delay, and the average delay. They used an evolutionary population (P) and a Pareto set (Pnd), their proposed algorithm starts with a random population (P), individuals evolve to optimal solutions, and these are included in (Pnd).

They proposed also other multi-objective multicast routing algorithm (MMA) based on SPEA that simultaneously optimizes the maximum link utilization, the cost of the multicast tree, the end-to-end delay, and the average time (Crichigno & Barán, 2004). In the MMA1 algorithm, they used the binary tournament selection; in the MMA2 algorithm, they used the roulette selection.

Koyama et al. (Koyama, Barolli, Matsumoto, & Apduhan, 2004) have proposed a multi-objective genetic algorithm optimizing the cost and delay of the routing tree, their proposed approach is a source-based routing method and has a flexible and adaptive behavior. The experimentations demonstrate the performance of their proposed solution

Donoso et al. (Donoso, Fabregat, & Marzo, 2004) proposed a new a multi-objective traffic engineering scheme using different distribution trees to multicast several flows by combining into a single aggregated metric the different objective functions of multicast routing.

Fabregat et al. (Fabregat, Donoso, Baran, Solano, & Marzo, 2005) proposed a new traffic engineering load balancing taxonomy, they developed a new algorithm inspired by the SPEA Algorithm.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing