Strategies for Effective Use of Technology in Face-to-Face and Hybrid University Level Courses to Improve Student Learning

Strategies for Effective Use of Technology in Face-to-Face and Hybrid University Level Courses to Improve Student Learning

Balkeese V. Kunhi Mohamed (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA)
Copyright: © 2013 |Pages: 14
DOI: 10.4018/jksr.2013040106
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to (1) briefly discuss the definitions of face-to-face learning, hybrid learning, and related terms concerning the continuum of technology-based learning methods as proposed by Bates (2001) and Bates and Poole (2003); (2) introduce effective uses of technology in face-to-face and hybrid university level courses; and (3) discuss justifications based in research literature for the use of technology to enhance student learning. Technological recommendations include use of multimedia technologies; interactive white boards; and course management systems. This review of literature discusses both theoretical and research based articles and includes empirical studies showing the relationship between effective use of technology and student. The main focus of this paper is to introduce strategies for effective use of technology in both face-to-face and hybrid-style university level courses. This paper is intended for higher-education instructors in both face-to-face and hybrid-style instructional contexts.
Article Preview

1. Introduction

…appropriate use of technologies can make learning more interesting and enriching for students….learning is an individual process and that collaborative and cooperative learning environments are important means of constructing knowledge. (Khine & Lourdusamy, 2003, p. 671)

In this digital world, many higher education embracing technology in classroom and learning environment as means of delivering method. The growth of integrating technology has been largely powered not only by the mere presence of technology, but by the anticipation on the part of students that technology will be used as a tool to enhance the classroom experience and their learning (Tileston, 2004). More profoundly, Hanna and de Nooy (2003) claimed student learning improves with the use of technology as an instructional tool. However, Timpson (1999) the idea of ‘learning’ can involve” memory, permanent change in behavior, measurable, understanding, and the ability to apply in another situation” (p. 29).

To date, though face-to-face instructional method is indisputable to be seen as one of the ways to promote collaboration, interaction, and to enhance student learning. Similarly, Timpson, Yang, Borrayo, and Canetto (2005), classroom interaction and connecting teaching and learning are vital to enhance learning. The adoption of hybrid learning is becoming prudent and extensively used in many higher educational institutions. However, Strauss (2005) averred the technology has been slower in the college instructional classroom.

As supported by Bates (2001), technology has been used to support and supplement classroom teaching with classroom aids such as slate, blackboard and chalk, textbooks, flip-charts, laboratory equipment, radio, film, television, the overhead projector, and computers. He asserted:

Technology used in this way does not replace either the teacher or the classroom. Using technology to supplement classroom teaching does not radically change teaching methods. It merely enhances what would be done in the classroom in any case. (p. 17)

With these ideas in mind, the question remains, what are the strategies that can be employed effectively both in face-to-face and hybrid courses? Therefore, this paper will look at the descriptions of face-to-face, hybrid learning and other related terms as proposed by Bates (2001) and Bates and Poole (2003) continuum of technology-based learning. Next, three strategies for effective use of technology in face-to-face and hybrid university level courses with evidence that each improves or enhances student learning will be examined, followed by summary and conclusion.

2. Continuum Of Technology-Based Learning

The continuum technology-based learning will be utilized to generate the following discussion on the accounts of face-to-face, blended or hybrid learning (mixed mode), distributed learning, distance education, and fully online. (see Figure 2 in the Appendix)

Figure 2.

The continuum of technology-based learning. (Source: Effective teaching with technology in Higher Education: Foundations for success, Bates & Poole, 2003, p. 127)

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing