Article Preview
TopIntroduction
Operational strategies of organizations have been shifted towards integrated SC strategies rather than independent operations with both suppliers and customers (Silveira & Arkader, 2007). Supply Chain Management (SCM) is a key strategic approach for increasing organizational effectiveness and the realization of organizational goals. SCM helps in achieving the co-ordination between organizations as well as with customers (Dath, Rajendran, & Narashiman, 2010). The information sharing (IS) enabled supply chain (SC) needs closer relationships among its partners. It requires a level of trust, commitment, co-operation, co-ordination and collaboration between SC members for its success (Richey, Che, Upreti, Fawcett, Adams, 2009). There are many factors which hinders in achieving SC benefits to the organizations. These factors are known as Information sharing Barriers (ISBs).
Many researchers (see Table 1) have discussed the various ISBs which hinder organizations to implement IS. Pujara, Kant, & Singh (2011) discussed the mutual effect of eleven ISBs over each other. They developed relationships among eleven identified ISBs. In this paper, eighteen ISBs (see Table 1) have been chosen on the basis of literature review and the opinions of experts from both industry and academia for development of structural model.
ISM is a well-established methodology for identifying relationships using group learning process among specific items which define a problem or an issue (Warfield, 1974; Sage, 1977). Therefore, in this research, ISBs have been analyzed using the ISM approach.
The main objectives of this paper are to identify and rank the ISBs, to establish relationships among the identified ISBs using ISM, and to discuss the organizational implications of this research and suggest directions for future research.
Table 1.
Information sharing barriers in SC
ISB Number (ISB No.) | Information Sharing Barriers (ISB) | References |
Tokar et al., (2011)
|
Awad and Nassar (2010)
|
Johnson (2010)
|
Lee et al., (2010)
| Forsuland and Jonsson (2009) |
Gonzalex et al., (2010)
|
Matook et al., (2009)
|
Richey et al., (2009)
|
Archer et al., (2008)
|
Bakker et al., (2008)
|
Fawcett et al., (2008)
|
Adebanjo et al., (2006)
|
Cassivi (2006)
|
Storey, Emberson, Godsell, & Harrison (2006)
|
Storey, Emberson, & Reade (2005)
|
Childerhouse et al., (2003a)
|
Childerhouse et al., (2003b)
|
Larsen et al., (2003)
|
Lambert et al., (1998)
|
1 | Lack of Top Management Support | √ | | √ | √ | | | | | | √ | √ | | | | √ | | | | √ |
2 | Lack of Strategic Planning | | √ | | √ | | | | √ | | | √ | | | | | √ | | | |
3 | Lack of Information Flow | | | | | | √ | | | | | | √ | | √ | | | | | |
4 | Lack of organization structure | | | √ | | | | | | √ | | √ | | | √ | √ | | | | √ |
5 | Lack of Supportive Culture | | √ | | | | | | √ | | √ | | | | √ | | | √ | √ | √ |
6 | Lack of trust | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | | | | √ | | √ | | | | | √ | |
7 | Lack of SCM benefits | | | | | | √ | | | | | √ | | | | | | | √ | |
8 | Lack of SCM measure | | | | | √ | | | | | | | | | √ | | | | | √ |
9 | Lack of SC integration | | √ | | | √ | | √ | √ | | | √ | | | | | | √ | | |
10 | Lack of training and education | | | | | | | √ | | | | | | √ | | | | | √ | √ |
11 | Lack of IS/IT | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | √ | √ | | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | | |
12 | Lack of cost sharing | | √ | | | | √ | | | √ | | | | | | | √ | √ | | |
13 | Lack of Fund | | √ | | | | √ | | | | | | | | | | | | √ | |
14 | Un-realization of Boundaries of SC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | √ | | √ | | | √ |
15 | Unwillingness to Share information | | | | | | √ | | | | | √ | | | | | √ | √ | √ | |
16 | Lack of supplier competencies | | √ | | | | √ | √ | √ | | √ | | | | | √ | | | | |
17 | Resistance to change | | √ | √ | √ | | | | √ | | √ | √ | | | | | | | | |
18 | Risk of Data Loss | | √ | √ | | √ | | | | | | | √ | √ | √ | | √ | | | |