The Role of the Digital Economy in Market Disruption: Analyzing a Case Study That Demonstrates the Role of New Digital Base Entrants

The Role of the Digital Economy in Market Disruption: Analyzing a Case Study That Demonstrates the Role of New Digital Base Entrants

Rui P. Silva, Henrique S. Mamede
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 13
DOI: 10.4018/IJIDE.303614
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The role of the digital economy is undoubtful these days, with new digital services and technologies appearing regularly, creating new products, and digitalizing others. With the technology exploring new limits, the growth tendency of this economy is clear, and more incumbents will face serious competition, which can’t be ignored. Several of these startups have untapped markets that are not being addressed, exploring that disruption leads to more innovative solutions that will likely lead to better services for people and organizations. Those startups might, though, move up the ladder and take away the market from those incumbents; with this work, we aim to analyze the role of digital economies in market disruption through the lenses of a case study and understand to what extent that case is looking at disrupt an existing market
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The digital economy enables growth and productivity, with many consumers private and public companies embracing digital technologies, which ultimately leads to better utilization of capital and labor and unlocks the possibility of participating in global value chains (Miller & Atkinson, 2014). Today, the digital economy is present in our lives through many different services we engage in for other aspects. That being a Netflix or a food delivery service.

How can we define the digital economy? Sahut et al. (2021) describe the Digital Economy as “the process of entrepreneurial creation of digital value through various socio-technical digital enablers to support the effective acquisition, processing, distribution, and consumption of digital information.”

This definition draws a relationship between the digital economy and digital entrepreneurship, which the authors then define as “the process of entrepreneurial creation of digital value through various socio-technical digital enablers to support the effective acquisition, processing, distribution, and consumption of digital information”.

Value creation is either created through incumbents or new entrants who can innovate differently (Christensen, 1997).

Professor Clayton Christensen (Christensen, 1997) positions two types of technologies that innovators may make use of to generate that value:

  • 1.

    Sustaining Technologies – Often well-accepted technologies that support incremental business improvements (Sandström et al., 2009).

  • 2.

    Disruptive Technologies: Disruptive technologies and innovation tackles the status quo and tend to address an untapped market because larger incumbents skip it (Sandström et al., 2009).

To explain the difference between sustained and disruptive technology, researchers and practitioners often refer to the work done by Christensen (Christensen, 1997; Christensen & Raynor, 2003) (illustrated in Figure 1)

Figure 1.

Disruptive innovation characteristics (Adapted from Christensen, 1997; Christensen & Raynor, 2003)

IJIDE.303614.f01

In their study, Charitou & Markides (2003) defend that “Disruptive technologies produce a new value by offering a service or product that did not exist before compared to existing technologies.” On the same note, Professor Christensen (Christensen, 2003) said that “Disruptive technologies render entire industries obsolete, giving a new dimension to existing competition led by new technologies.”

In his work, Markides (2006) also states something of critical relevance in his work “Disruptive business models introduce threats to existing ways, but also opportunities for new sources of competitive advantage” as companies grow, it becomes more complex to embrace disruptive technologies. (Christensen, 1997).

A great example of this scenario is the logistics environment, where there is a clear understanding that disruptive innovation in global logistics is something that incumbents must focus on (Bharadwaj et al., 2013; Cichosz et al., 2020; Dobrovnik et al., 2018; Goldsby & Zinn, 2016; Klötzer & Pflaum, 2017), with their position being challenged by startups with disruptive technologies that offer services to customers that previously were provided by established companies (Hooper & Holtbrügge, 2020; Sandström et al. 2009; Sucky & Asdecker, 2019; Tsiulin et al., 2020; World Bank, 2016).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing