The Use of Virtual Worlds for Developing Intercultural Competences

The Use of Virtual Worlds for Developing Intercultural Competences

Lisiane Machado, Amarolinda Zanela Klein, Angilberto Freitas, Eliane Schlemmer, Cristiane Drebes Pedron
DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.2016070105
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In this research, the authors present a framework for developing Intercultural Competence (IC) and use Tridimensional Digital Virtual Worlds (3DVW) as environments for developing Intercultural Competence. They developed an artifact, via Design Research, constituted by an educational method using the 3DVW Second Life® as the place for a virtual exchange program between 92 Brazilian and Portuguese master students. The results of the authors' study indicate that the 3DVW can be used for the development of IC because it allows rich experiential and relational/conversational learning opportunities, especially due to the affordances of immersion/sense of presence, social interaction, content production and knowledge sharing.
Article Preview
Top

Theoretical Foundations

Working in intercultural contexts requires the individual ability to learn from new and different experiences. It is aligned with the concept of experiential learning, which can be defined as “the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience” (Kolb, 1984, p. 41). By transformation of experience Kolb means that experiential learning is a process of constructing knowledge that involves a creative tension among four learning modes - experiencing, reflecting, thinking, and acting - that is responsive to contextual demands. This process can be depicted as a learning cycle or spiral where the learner touches all the learning modes in a recursive process that is responsive to the learning situation and what is being learned (Kolb, 1984).

Experiential Learning Theory

In the experiential learning model proposed by Kolb (1984), learning is conceived as a four-stage cycle in which immediate concrete experience is the basis for individual observation and reflection, followed by the development of abstract concepts and generalizations from these experiences, which form “theories” that will be tested in new situations, to make decisions and solve problems. As Kolb (1981) states, learning is a process involving the resolution of dialectical conflicts between opposing modes of dealing with the world - action and reflection, concreteness and abstraction.

The Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) has been applied in a variety of learning contexts with distinct objectives (see for instance: Friar & Eddleston, 2007; Pittaway & Cope, 2007; Cook & Olson, 2006; Hardless, 2005; Hoover et al, 2010). However, despite the acceptance of ELT, it tends to be problematic from a relational point of view (Shotter, 1993), since Kolb’s cycle emphasizes individual, cognitive understanding and adaptation to a real world.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 3 Issues (2022)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing