Understanding Consumer Acceptance of M-Wallet Apps: The Role of Perceived Value, Perceived Credibility, and Technology Anxiety

Understanding Consumer Acceptance of M-Wallet Apps: The Role of Perceived Value, Perceived Credibility, and Technology Anxiety

Jayanthi Thanigan, Srinivasa N. Reddy, Priya Sethuraman, J. Irudhaya Rajesh
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 27
DOI: 10.4018/JECO.2021010104
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The m-wallet apps market in India is an evolving industry. M-wallet app companies could use the consumer insights from this study to design suitable strategies to retain existing users and attract new customers. Earlier studies in m-wallet app adoption in India have been restricted to GPRS services only. This study is unique in extending use of the UTAUT model theoretical framework to understand the factors influencing customers using the evolved 4G technology in India. The research hypothesis, based on the extended UTAUT model, was empirically tested using structural equation modeling. There was a significant improvement in the overall explanatory power of the extended UTAUT model over the original UTAUT.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

India has always been a booming market for mobile space, as it enjoys one of the highest mobile penetration rates in the world (NewZoo, 2017). Equally, the Indian economy also has a high level of banking penetration. Although the banking services have remained traditional, the advent of mobile services has made a significant mark on the changing mindset of Indian banking customers (Shah, Roongta, Jain, & Kaushik, 2016). Within the gamut of mobile banking financial services, M-wallet payment solutions are thriving worldwide, including in India, as customers are switching over to smartphones and high-speed mobile internet (Karjaluoto, Shaikh, Saarijärvi, & Saraniemi, 2018). In February 2018 alone, mobile wallet app (henceforth M-wallet app) customers completed 310 million transactions, which is a threefold increase over the 99 million transactions in October 2016 (Reserve Bank of India, 2018).

M-wallet usage has in part accelerated due to the Indian Government’s demonetization policy in 2016. This resulted in a cash crunch and the subsequent necessity for alternative payment solutions such as M-wallets among bank customers. The Indian Government’s policy to promote ‘Digital India’ has given a great impetus to customers to use alternate payment methods such as the M-wallet (Financial Express, 2018). A closer look at the Indian M-wallet app market reveals that one player (Paytm) is holding 42% of the market share, whereas the rest of the market is deeply fragmented in nature (RedSeerResearch, 2017). The M-wallet market in India is poised to grow to USD 4.4 billion by 2022 (Capgemini & RBS, 2015) and to USD 1 trillion by 2033 (Credit Suisse, 2018). These statistics and projections show record growth in the M-wallet industry. However, considering India’s population and the vast proportion of mobile users (300 million smartphone users) (Live Mint, 2017; NewZoo, 2017; Nokia, 2018), the growth cannot be considered particularly significant or phenomenal. This may be due to various existing factors related to hesitation in consumer acceptance of M-wallet apps in the Indian context.

The evolution of electronic payment systems in an economy provides considerable social benefits (Humphrey, Kim, & Vale, 2001). However, a significant proportion of merchants and customers in India still prefer cash, because of its high convenience and perceived low risk (Bijapurkar, Shukla, & Mridusmita, 2014; Dahlberg, Guo, & Ondrus, 2015; Stavins, 2017). Although there are approximately 29.1 million credit cards and 890 million debit cards in the country, studies suggest that most of these cards (77% by value) are used for cash withdrawals from Automated Teller Machines (ATM) (Reserve Bank of India, 2017). Additionally, those who use M-wallets generally use them for lower value payments (Reserve Bank of India, 2018).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 22: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 21: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2003)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing