Understanding Outsourcing Risk Factors Based on Modularity: The BSKYB Case

Understanding Outsourcing Risk Factors Based on Modularity: The BSKYB Case

Philip Huysmans (University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium), Peter De Bruyn (University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium), Shazdada Benazeer (University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium), Alain De Beuckelaer (Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands), Steven De Haes (University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium) and Jan Verelst (University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium)
Copyright: © 2014 |Pages: 17
DOI: 10.4018/ijitbag.2014010104
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

The outsourcing of Information Systems development and maintenance to external and specialized partners is a frequent practice among contemporary organizations. However, outsourcing projects have been proven to be prone for failure. As a result, practitioners and scholars have suggested a variety of outsourcing risk factors which may lead to unsuccessful project outcomes, as well as possible remedies to mitigate them. Empirical studies nevertheless continue to report frequent failures in outsourcing projects. In this paper, the concept of modularity is used as an alternative perspective to analyze risks related to outsourcing projects. Such approach might help in supplementing existing outsourcing risk analyses with new, additional or more profound insights on this topic. It might also serve as an additional basis to list a more exhaustive enumeration of required mitigating actions, which in turn could lead to more succesful outsourcing projects. This alternative perspective is illustrated by a reanalysis of a failed outsourcing case which is documented in literature and available court proceedings: the BSkyB case. It is shown in a specific way how poorly designed modular structures at the technical and project communication and project management level could have been identified ex-ante. This identification may explain the manifestation of ex-post outsourcing risk factors such as ‘lack of required skills', ‘managing user expectation', ‘communication problems', ‘project management' and ‘significant integration requirements'.
Article Preview

2. Research Question

Building on the problem statement as discussed in previous section, this paper proposes an alternative approach, based on the concept of modularity, to identify outsourcing risks ex-ante. The modularity concept states that a system can be decomposed into several interrelated subsystems (i.e., modules). This concept, originating from systems theory, turned out to be a successful means for controlling complex systems in several domains, including product design, software design, etcetera (Baldwin & Clark, 2000). Because outsourcing projects are generally conceived as being complex, especially in dynamic environments, it seems reasonable to explore the possibilities of using the modularity concept in addressing outsourcing complexities. As a matter of fact, several scholars have recently suggested a possible link between the general concepts of ‘modularity’ and ‘outsourcing’ (see e.g., (Campagnolo & Camuffo, 2010; Tiwana, 2008)). More specifically, various authors link modularity to the explanation of outsourcing failures (Hecker & Kohleick, 2006; Zirpoli & Becker, n.d.). However, many of these scholars only identify this link while the call for more in-depth case analyses remains unresolved.

Given this lack of in-depth research, it seems plausible that such an alternative perspective can help in complementing existing outsourcing risk analyses with new and deeper insights, as such providing a more complete basis to define a more exhaustive list of mitigating actions. The research question of this paper can therefore be formulated as follows: How can the concept of modularity help in obtaining a better ex-ante understanding of outsourcing risks? To answer this question, this paper analyzes the BSkyB outsourcing case: a failed outsourcing project between EDS (the vendor) and BSkyB (the client), of which extensive and objective case details are publicly available in the form of court proceedings. Even though this outsourcing case has already been scrutinized by some scholars (Verner & Abdullah, 2012), to the best of our knowledge no profound case analysis has discussed this case in relation to the modularity concept.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 8: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing