Visualizing Moderating Effects in Path Models with Latent Variables

Visualizing Moderating Effects in Path Models with Latent Variables

Ned Kock
Copyright: © 2016 |Pages: 7
DOI: 10.4018/IJeC.2016010101
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Path models with and without latent variables are extensively used in e-collaboration research. Both direct and moderating relationships can be included in such path models. Moderating relationships involve three latent variables, the moderating variable and a pair of variables that are connected through a direct link. This paper discusses the visualization of moderating relationships through two-dimensional and three-dimensional graphs. The software WarpPLS version 5.0 is used in this discussion, since it provides an extensive set of graphs that can be used to visualize moderating effects.
Article Preview
Top

Data Used In The Analyses

Departing from a “true” model, which is a model for which we know the nature of the relationships among variables and their respective magnitudes, we created 300 rows of data for several latent variables and indicators based on a Monte Carlo simulation (Robert & Casella, 2005; Paxton et al., 2001). These are equivalent to 300 returned questionnaires.

The true model was based on an actual study of the effects of e-collaboration technology use on team-based project success, previously used by Kock & Lynn (2012) to illustrate the phenomena of vertical and lateral collinearity. At the time of this writing, the data we created was publicly available as a sample dataset from the WarpPLS web site: warppls.com.

The following variables were included in the illustrative analyses discussed here: e-collaboration technology use (ECollab), project management (Projmgt), job satisfaction (JSat), and project success (Success). More details about these variables are provided below.

E-Collaboration Technology Use (ECollab)

This is the main technology-related latent variable in the model. It measures, through three indicators, the extent to which a team that is tasked with the development of a new product (e.g., a new toothpaste or airplane part) uses an e-collaboration technology that integrates several synchronous and asynchronous features (e.g., e-mail, text-based chat, video-conferencing, discussion board).

Project Management (Projmgt)

This latent variable measures, through three indicators, the degree to which the team uses project management techniques that allow team members to monitor and control the progress of their work.

Job Satisfaction (JSat)

This latent variable measures, through three indicators, the degree to which team members are satisfied with their current jobs.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 7 Issues (2023)
Volume 18: 6 Issues (2022): 3 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing