Who Trusts Who?: The Role of Individual and Organizational Level in Determining the Nature of Inter-Organizational Trust

Who Trusts Who?: The Role of Individual and Organizational Level in Determining the Nature of Inter-Organizational Trust

Risto Seppänen
Copyright: © 2014 |Pages: 21
DOI: 10.4018/ijkbo.2014010102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Previous research on the nature of trust in an organizational context provided somewhat controversial and ambiguous results. There are both conceptual and operational difficulties in exploring this intuitively individual-level phenomenon at organizational and inter-organizational levels. The fundamental question of where trust resides in inter-organizational relationships remains unresolved. This qualitative study focuses on inter-organizational trust in dyadic business relationships. The phenomenon is approached both from the concept of the trustor and the trustee. The results suggest that the trusting party is not the organization itself, but the individuals who constitute it. Instead, the ultimate object of trust in inter-organizational settings is both individual boundary-spanners, and the organization.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Where does inter-organizational trust reside? Attempts to answer this question in prior research have resulted in various conceptualizations and results. These variations in interpretations and definitions are apparently due to the fact that “a fundamental challenge in conceptualizing the role of trust in economic exchange is extending an inherently individual-level phenomenon to organizational level of analysis” (Zaheer, McEvily, & Perrone, 1998, 141).

Trust was originally seen to be an individual-level phenomenon by nature. Only individuals were viewed as capable of having “subjective mental states” (Currall & Inkpen, 2002) and attitudes (Aulakh, Kotabe & Sahay, 1996). Later on, trust research expanded to such fields of organizational research as organizational psychology, organizational behavior, and behavioral economics. Indeed, trust and related issues have become more and more interesting and important in organizational studies (Tyler, 2003). Increasingly, trust has received attention also in the research of inter-organizational relationships (e.g. Perrone, Zaheer & McEvily, 2003; Sako, 1992; Ring & Van de Ven, 1992, 1994; Lane & Bachmann, 1998; Child & Faulkner, 1998). An obvious reason for this is a need to cope with the uncertainty, dependency, asymmetry, and risk that inevitably exist in relationships between organizations, no matter how close and collaborative these relationships are.

Zaheer, McEvily, and Perrone (1998) propose that it is the individuals in organizations who do the trusting, not the organizations themselves. On the other hand, trust is seen to facilitate organizational level performance, leading ultimately to firm-level competitive advantage (Barney & Hansen, 1994). Moreover, trust is argued to enhance collaboration (Dibben, 2000; Child, 2001), and “coordination of economic activities” (Zaheer, McEvily, & Perrone, 1998, 141) on an inter-firm level, and is thus an essential factor in economic exchange (Arrow, 1974; Granovetter, 1985; Doney, Barry & Abratt, 2007).

The problem with organizational and inter-organizational level trust studies is that the concept of trust itself at an inter-organizational level has been defined and conceptualized in various ways. At organizational and especially inter-organizational levels, there is an obvious challenge in defining both the trusting party and the objects of trust. Consequently, the conceptualization of inter-organizational trust in prior research has taken place at both individual and organizational levels. Trustor–trustee discussion, under the label of inter-organizational trust, is divided into individual–individual, individual–organization, organization–individual, and organization–organization levels. In other words, both the subject of trust and the object of trust are defined to be either an individual or a whole organization. Moreover, trust in previous literature reports has also been seen as a multi-level phenomenon (see e.g. Currall & Inkpen, 2002), operating at both individual and organizational levels (Mayer, Davis, & Schoorman, 1995).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2022): 3 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing