Work Ethic Differences Between Traditional and Telework Employees

Work Ethic Differences Between Traditional and Telework Employees

Ruth A. Guthrie (University of Redlands, USA) and James B. Pick (University of Redlands, USA)
Copyright: © 1998 |Pages: 9
DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.1998100104
OnDemand PDF Download:
Available
$29.50
Current Special Offers
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $29.50

Abstract

Over the past five years, reports on the gains associated with telework have been remarkable (Murphy, 1996; Hesse, et. al., 1991). Productivity can be increased by 30%, workers are more satisfied with their jobs and telework could reduce traffic and pollution problems. However, there is also research that speaks about the resistance to telework. Firms are reluctant to adopt telework programs and employees are reluctant to give up traditional work structures (Handy & Mokhtarian, 1995). Part of this reluctance can be described in terms of ethics and evolving behavioral norms. Telework is posing new questions about rules of conduct, work ethic and work privacy Kurland (1996). This study examines ethical scenarios that arise in telework environments. This study reports the ethical attitudes of 134 Los Angeles area managers and professionals on telecommuting scenarios. Eighteen ethical scenarios, Table 2, relating to freedom of work ethic, work place monitoring, compensation, work and family, and equity were posed. Results of the survey show that organizational level, telecommuting experience and gender issues do not strongly influence ethical decisions in the given scenarios. People at lower organizational levels do not appear to be any more traditional in their view on telework than people at higher organizational levels. People who had telecommuting experience were no more liberal in their work ethic views than those without telecommuting experience.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing