Work Perceptions Among Hong Kong and United States I/S Workers: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Work Perceptions Among Hong Kong and United States I/S Workers: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Norman B. Bryan (University of North Carolina, USA), Ephraim R. Mclean (Georgia State University, USA), Stanley J. Smits (Georgia State University, USA) and Janice Burn (Hong Kong Polytechnic, Hong Kong)
Copyright: © 1995 |Pages: 8
DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.1995100103

Abstract

Hong Kong and United States information systems (I/S) workers’ perceptions of work are analyzed according to Hofstede’s cultural paradigm. More specifically, the theoretical emphasis of this research is a test of the cultural divergence hypothesis as it relates to the individualism/collectivism dimension of Hofstede’s analysis. Further, smallest space analysis, a multidimensional scaling technique, is used to assess the differences between the two cultures. The hypothesized differences between the two cultures is partially supported; Hong Kong and United States I/S workers differ along the individualism/collectivism dimension of Hofstede’s paradigm, but not in the manner initially thought. Implications of these findings for both I/S professionals and end-users are discussed.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles
Volume 32: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing