Applied E-Learning and E-Teaching in Higher Education

Applied E-Learning and E-Teaching in Higher Education

Roisin Donnelly (Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland) and Fiona McSweeney (Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland)
Indexed In: SCOPUS
Release Date: July, 2008|Copyright: © 2009 |Pages: 440
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-814-7
ISBN13: 9781599048147|ISBN10: 1599048140|EISBN13: 9781599048178|ISBN13 Softcover: 9781616925949
  • Free shipping on orders $395+
  • Printed-On-Demand (POD)
  • Usually ships one day from order
  • 20% discount on 5+ titles*
(Multi-User License)
  • Multi-user license (no added fee)
  • Immediate access after purchase
  • No DRM
  • ePub with PDF download
  • 20% discount on 5+ titles*
Hardcover +
(Multi-User License)
  • Free shipping on orders $395+
  • Printed-On-Demand (POD)
  • Usually ships one day from order
  • Multi-user license (no added fee)
  • Immediate access after purchase
  • No DRM
  • ePub with PDF download
  • 20% discount on 5+ titles*
(Individual Chapters)
  • Purchase individual chapters from this book
  • Immediate PDF download after purchase or access through your personal library
  • 20% discount on 5+ titles*
Description & Coverage

Over the past decade, computer-enhanced learning has increased in demand due to developments in technological aids such as multimedia presentation and the internet. In this age of technology, it is imperative for teachers to consider the importance of technological integration in the classroom.

Applied E-Learning and E-Teaching in Higher Education presents international practices in the development and use of applied e-Learning and e-Teaching in the classroom in order to enhance student experience, add value to teaching practices, and illuminate best practices in the area of e-Assessment. This innovative title provides fresh insight into e-Learning and e-Teaching practices while exploring the varying roles of academic staff in adoption and application.


The many academic areas covered in this publication include, but are not limited to:

  • Academic Development
  • E-Learning
  • E-Teaching
  • Higher Education
  • Interprofessional Education
  • Multi-Point Audio Conferencing
  • Multi-Professional Teams
  • Multimedia Resources
  • Online Academic Development
  • Online Pre-Induction Courses
  • Online Role-Play
  • Online Summative Assessment Lifecycle
  • Problem-Based Learning
  • Research Methods Teaching
  • Software Engineering Education
  • Student-Centered Learning
  • Web-Based Academic Development
Reviews and Testimonials

This book to provides directional choices for academics in higher education through the provision of guidelines shared by a variety of academics across disciplines.

– Roisin Donnelly, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland

Authors share experiences integrating information technology in software engineering education and online discussion groups.

– Book News Inc.

This innovative title provides insight into e-learning practices, while exploring the varying roles of academic staff in adoption and application.

– Automation of Procurement and Accounting Data Entry Reviews (APADE)
Table of Contents
Search this Book:
Editor Biographies
Dr. Roisin Donnelly has over 15 years of experience in higher education both as a lecturer and researcher. She has taught in universities in Northern Ireland and was a lecturer and visiting research fellow in the University of New South Wales, Sydney. She is currently Programme Co-ordinator for DIT’s MSc Applied eLearning, and tutors and supervises on the PG Certificate, Diploma and MA in Third Level Learning and Teaching. She has a range of chapter and journal publications to reflect her teaching and research interests, including academic development, designing eLearning, supporting virtual communities, tranformative pedagogies and blended problem-based learning.
Fiona McSweeney lectures in developmental psychology and research methods in the Department of Social Sciences of the Dublin Institute of Technology and in the psychology of learning and research methods with Waterford Institute of Technology. She has also worked as a learning development officer in the DIT. Her research interests focus on the student experience of higher education, assessment, the impact of professional education on identity, academic mentoring and the use of VLEs as a support for student learning and engagement in education. She is currently undertaking an Ed.D. with The Open University on student and professional identity and support.
Peer Review Process
The peer review process is the driving force behind all IGI Global books and journals. All IGI Global reviewers maintain the highest ethical standards and each manuscript undergoes a rigorous double-blind peer review process, which is backed by our full membership to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Learn More >
Ethics & Malpractice
IGI Global book and journal editors and authors are provided written guidelines and checklists that must be followed to maintain the high value that IGI Global places on the work it publishes. As a full member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), all editors, authors and reviewers must adhere to specific ethical and quality standards, which includes IGI Global’s full ethics and malpractice guidelines and editorial policies. These apply to all books, journals, chapters, and articles submitted and accepted for publication. To review our full policies, conflict of interest statement, and post-publication corrections, view IGI Global’s Full Ethics and Malpractice Statement.


During the last 800 years, higher education has shown its sustainability, adaptability and transformable capability. Today there is increasingly a need to negotiate the complexities of the Information Age, which become more and more demanding as we are influenced by technology and the greater interconnectedness of nations and their peoples. Our new knowledge societies require more flexibility in their educational structures to adapt more readily to new styles of learning and teaching, new intellectual and social needs, and new levels of skills development. Such transformation is often referred as “The Learning Revolution” (Oblinger and Rush, 1997) and is taking place in a new era of global digital competition in higher education. Indeed Oblinger (2006) has said that today’s learners are digital, connected, experiential, immediate and social, with preferences for learning which include peer-to-peer, interaction and engagement, visual and relevance.

Applied eLearning and eTeaching in higher education cover multiple possibilities, including the marriage of the learner, teacher and a growing range of technologies available today. This book is a contribution towards a collective inquiry which pools experience, pinpointing gaps and indications of perceived needs in this large and sometimes blurred field. The themes in the book have emerged from the authors themselves, as they chose to write about issues that are pertinent to them as practitioners and researchers in higher education. Ultimately this book aims to provide directional choices for academics in higher education through the provision of guidelines shared by a variety of academics across disciplines.

Critical research to date on the application of theory to eLearning practice has been epistemic in focus at times, but widespread and plentiful in addressing such issues as what is eLearning and eTeaching and how does online learning occur. Practical case studies abound in the separate literatures of eLearning and eTeaching in higher education. It is argued that the questions raised and the issues analysed in this book have become more urgent and pertinent in recent years for academic staff and those charged with providing flexible opportunities for their development. This book therefore makes a case for an analysis of key on-the-ground themes for academic staff and academic developers.

In the field of eLearning, research has demonstrated that problems have emerged in higher education practice because it is based on anecdotal evidence and minimal theory, questionable validity of tests, lack of control groups and objective learning measures, and difficulty in comparison of results across domains. Some of the identified research gaps at the beginning of the new millennium have been variations in tutor moderation, online debating, student perceptions of the eLearning environment, development of online learning communities, critical thinking and problem-solving applications in synchronous and asynchronous environments, peer tutoring and online mentoring, student retention, conceptual referencing and online collaboration (Bonk and Wisher, 2000).

However there remains a growing fissure: trying to determine whether or not good eTeaching, of any kind, supports or encourages good eLearning is a thorny issue. There is not a generic definition of good eTeaching that suits all contexts and student cohorts, primarily because the terms good ‘eTeaching’ and ‘effective student eLearning’ are subjective and context dependent.

Each of the chapters in this book presents a number of strategies to assist the academic in coming to grips with the concept of change from a teacher-centred model to a learner-centred model of higher education, and the skills and experiences required by both staff and learners to make the successful transition to alternative learning environments. It has also been important to identify critical activities and actions which are required to facilitate this transition at higher education institutions. Undoubtedly, there have been high demands placed on both staff and learners to deal with these changes in education, influenced by both the rapid development and implementation of information technologies. Much has been written about the use of such technologies impacting not only on the ways in which staff teach but also on the ways in which learners learn. There remain significant numbers of staff and learners who are not adequately prepared or equipped to operate effectively in emerging alternative learning environments, particularly those environments which are technologically mediated. Indeed the authors in this book point out the advantages of eLearning environments for facilitating new student-centred ways of learning. This is the central issue of the chapter by Richard Walker and Walter Baets. The chapter by Ann Donohoe, Tim McMahon and Geraldine O’Neill and the one by Nick Pratt focus on reflection in work-based learning. Steve Millard, in his chapter, looks at online role-play, not only as preparation for assessment but also as a way of encouraging the development of transferable skills such as information seeking, reflection and perspective taking. In Ursula Wingate’s chapter the potential of eLearning for reflection on epistemological issues and new ways of learning is discussed.

Morag Munro and Barry McMullin examine how the use of technology in higher education can improve accessibility for all students in higher education. They also illustrate how design can make material inaccessible. This is also discussed in the chapter by Catherine and David Matheson.

Not only does the Internet represent a revolution for the learner, it also represents a sea change in the way that learning is delivered and supported and the consequent skills and techniques needed by the lecturer (Duggleby, 2000). The professional debate, and emerging practice today, surrounding the use of the Internet as a teaching, and by association learning and assessment, tool seems to be putting academics under increasing pressure. In an age where the use of Information and Communication Technologies is almost regarded as essential to everyday activity, teachers are dealing with demands to adapt their teaching to accommodate the new technologies. The chapter by Louise Jakobsen presents eLearning as an organisational culture change and suggests a way of implementing it. The adoption of learning technologies as everyday teaching tools has been placing pressure on academic staff; for some, using eLearning to deliver instruction is forcing them to rethink the ways in which they teach and learners learn, a theme mentioned by many of the authors. They are beginning to acknowledge that transferring the teaching techniques they have used in the past to an eLearning environment does not necessarily provide satisfactory results.

This book has also provided an ideal opportunity to explore key issues in professional academic development provided by the current movement towards increased use of eTeaching and learning technologies and the emerging field of online pedagogies, where future possibilities are largely unknown, and traditional notions of development may no longer be appropriate. Whilst this may offer particular threats to established beliefs and values within many disciplines, it can also help meet the demands from academics and institutions for increased flexibility in modes of teaching and learning. This research is an opportunity to problematise the very notion of “academic development”. Many of the chapters include this issue. For example, Diana Kelly’s chapter looks at academic development in preparation for eTutoring; Tony Cunningham et al. discuss the experiences of being eLearners and how this can transfer to eTutoring; Catherine Manathunga and Roisin Donnelly write about the international aspect of academic development. Academic development suggests that the main focus is the development of skills and knowledge in individuals, and that the change is about changing academics; this research suggests that what needs to be explored is the engagement of academics in negotiating the process of change happening in their teaching environment, and as part of their everyday practice of adapting to change.

This book aims to outline ways in which the discussion around eLearning academic development for academic staff can be broadened to include a more critical, more effective approach to design and implementation. A further issue worthy of exploration concerns the nature of effective academic eLearning development. It is suggested here that understanding the nature of academic work in eLearning and eTeaching is critical if we are to understand today’s higher education environment. As higher education has expanded, and more attention has been given externally to its quality, higher education institutions have naturally begun to devote more attention to the academic development function. This growth in academic development has been reflected in the establishment, in many institutions of higher education globally of centres for academic practice, staff development, learning and teaching, and a myriad of other titles. The challenge for those charged with developing teaching in higher education is to engage academics in a discourse of teaching and learning. Rowland (2005, p8) suggests that there is a lack of correlation between effective teaching and effective research, and believes this is likely to be the result of the weakness of a culture of enquiry (in both teaching and research) in higher education. Such a culture requires learning, teaching and research to be mutually enhancing.

Does good academic development result in improved eTeaching or blended learning which in time leads to enhanced student learning outcomes? Chapters in this book illuminate these questions, and the studies outlined may contribute towards a better understanding of the emerging conceptions and practical approaches used by academic staff and eLearning developers. It important to foster a lecturer’s increasing knowledge of effective pedagogical practices for successful eLearning, and this is most effective when the lecturers who are starting out as online educators can experiment and develop their skills in a safe and confined way.

The intention has been to provide an overview of relevant components of eLearning theories rather than give a complete exploration of such theories. However the research reported by various authors does provide discussion of a variety of theories and pedagogical strategies, for example the chapter by Timo Portimojärv and Pirjo Vuoskoski explores the use of problem based learning in learning about and developing leadership skills. Pankaj Kamthan argues for the combination of teacher-led (objectivism) and student-led (constructivism) learning to fuse student learning in and outside the classroom. It is hoped that future research will utilise the analysis and arguments presented here to contribute to further research in the field.

There appears to be a mutually sustaining cycle of reaction to the benefits of eLearning in higher education. Although online instruction is seen by many as a major breakthrough in learning and teaching, it has had its share of critics who do not believe it can actually solve difficult learning and teaching problems and believe that many barriers hinder effective online learning and teaching. Critics of eLearning have regularly noted that there is little evidence of its ability to improve learning outcomes, despite substantial worldwide investment in its development, and its wide uptake. Even when research about eLearning has been published showing that it is effective, or at least no less effective than other approaches, misgivings are held about the validity of that research.

The persistent challenge for higher education is to promote the development of highly complex knowledge structures, generic skills as well as transferability of knowledge and skills to future professional work. Emphasis is given today to problem-solving, team work, oral communication, the search for information from multiple sources and self- and group-directed initiatives. As eLearning is introduced into academic teaching, expectations arise as to how new learning technologies will contribute to this end. Issues that are educational in nature – such as sustainable content management (particularly discussed by Pankaj Kamthan as well as Gordon Joyes and Sheena Banks), sound pedagogical strategy, and learner support – can all too often be left at the periphery. An interesting component of research into the application of eLearning and eTeaching is the exploration of the role of the tutoring process as a central instructional strategy, integrated fully in everyday learning and teaching in institutions, in contrast to current practice that regards online tutoring as a peripheral activity. In their examination of the changing role of the tutor to eTutor Rhona Sharpe and Jill Pawlyn provide valuable information about the differences. In addition to the role of the eTutor is the part played by the educational developer in creating viable online learning resources. The first chapter, by Sabine Little, considers the role of the eLearning developer, in particular as part of a multi-disciplinary team. In relation to the development and delivery of online summative assessment, Heather Rai and Simon Wilkinson also discuss the roles and responsibilities of all those involved.

Today, there is an ever-increasing wide range of eLearning technologies available for the more traditional teaching and learning strategies (games, simulations, social networking tools, learning portals and learning object repositories, knowledge management tools, learning content management systems, Blogs, Moblogs, Pod Casting, Wikis, Vlogs, ePortfolios). The technologies that have revolutionized information exchange and enabled distributed learning continue to change at a rapid pace and influence advances in eLearning. Many studies have noted a relative emphasis on training in the use of technology at the expense of academic development that focuses on pedagogy and embedding technology into learning and teaching practices (McNaught, 2000), a point that is taken up by some of the authors in this volume.

However, as highlighted in the chapters by Nick Pratt and Ann Donohoe, Tim McMahon and Geraldine O’Neill the key to understanding how telecommunication technologies can enhance learning is to realise that the use of interactive telecommunication technologies alone does not ensure that meaningful interaction will occur. Two-way communications, whether synchronous or asynchronous, do not necessitate meaningful interaction. Adding a discussion forum, scheduling a few chat sessions, and using email alone will not lead to meaningful interactions. Nor do streaming media and animated graphics guarantee interaction.

In order for interaction to be meaningful it must enhance student performance and/or the learning experience. The technology itself enables various types and levels of interaction, whereas learning theory provides insight as to how and when these tools should be used to enhance learning. This is why an understanding of learning theory and pedagogical principles is vital.

The growth of eLearning requires the development of new instructional strategies that promotes an interactive collaborative learning environment. Unfortunately many novice teachers find it difficult to plan and manage meaningful eLearning interactions. When a teacher’s repertoire of instructional strategies is limited to teacher-directed methods and they can end up relying heavily on self-instructional text or lecture-based materials, failing to promote meaningful interactions among students, the instructor and content (Hirumi, 2002). Of course the real problem is that insufficient time, training and resources forces educators to revert back to what they know: teacher-directed instructional methods.

The challenge for education, then, is to design technologies for learning that draw both from knowledge about human cognition and from practical applications of how technology can facilitate complex tasks in the workplace. These designs use technologies to scaffold thinking and activity. Computer scaffolding enables learners to do more advanced activities and to engage in more advanced thinking and problem-solving than they could without such help.

When students use technology as a tool or as support for communicating with others, they are in an active role, rather than the passive role of recipient of information transmitted by a teacher, textbook, or broadcast. The student actively makes choices about how to generate, obtain, manipulate, or display information. Technology prompts students to actively think about information, making choices, and executing skills in a manner that is not typical in teacher-led lessons. Each student can be involved in independent or small-group work with the technology. Moreover, when technology is used as a tool to support students in performing authentic tasks, the students are in the position of defining their goals, making design decisions, and evaluating their progress.

In fact, technology often puts teachers in the role of learner alongside their students. This represents a big change from the traditional role of the teacher as the one with all the knowledge and right answers. Instead, students are given the chance to see their teachers perhaps acquire a new set of skills. Teachers who are not threatened by this change in roles report that the experience sensitizes them to the learning process in unexpected ways, giving them new insights into their students as learners. Engaging in the process of exploring technology with their students further provides teachers with an opportunity to demonstrate aspects of problem solving and learning that are rarely made visible in more product-oriented classrooms.

Technology-supported constructivist approaches are particularly energy-intensive for teachers who themselves have not been taught in this way and who need to acquire both the pedagogical and the technological skills required. Even when they have mastered the needed skills, many teachers find it difficult to sustain constructivist teaching approaches over time.

McConnell (2006) argues that, surprisingly, there has been little research looking at what actually happens in online learning communities: to date, we know very little about how they are formed, how members negotiate shared meanings about the nature of the community, how they work in the community and how the dynamics of learning in communities are controlled and what the effects of this are for those involved. We also know very little about the eventual outcomes of learning communities, and how members work together to produce meaningful learning outcomes. The chapter by Cunningham et al. sheds light on this.

All told, exploring applied eLearning and eTeaching is a challenging area. It is essential that all academics willing to engage in this process acknowledge that they too are learners and will need to reflect on their teaching and learning practices. Taking a reflective pause regularly is important, and taking time out from busy practice to write a chapter, each author in this book has been offered just that. We believe that the result has been worthwhile.

Structure of the Book
The book is divided into four sections, each focusing on a theme relating to eLearning and eTeaching. The first section, The Partners in the eLearning and eTeaching Process And The Role of Academic Development, contains chapters which examine eLearning and eTeaching from the viewpoints of the developer, the tutor and the students as well as examining academic development.

The emphasis in Section 2 is on accessibility, examining it in a broad context as well as with regard to the use of multi-media in higher education as a way of improving accessibility. The chapters of Section 3 all focus on designing for eLearning and eTeaching, looking at various issues and subject disciplines. The potential of eLearning for student induction, the use of eLearning for class based and independent student learning in software engineering and the development of an online resource for learning about research are the subject matter of the first three chapters. The use of eLearning tools to support knowledge building, discourse, reflection and collaboration among learners in management, nursing and teaching education is dealt with in chapters 12, 13 and 14. Chapter 15 looks at the partnership between problem based learning and technology in developing leadership skills in the field of health care.

Section 4 concentrates on the area of online assessment. The first chapter here looks at role play as a way of preparing for discursive forms of assessment while the second chapter describes the process of developing and administering summative assessment online.