21st Century Problem-Based Learning: A Medical Education Asset by Rational Design or Retrofit

21st Century Problem-Based Learning: A Medical Education Asset by Rational Design or Retrofit

Susan Ely, Joanne H. Greenawald, Richard C. Vari
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1468-9.ch006
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

An account of 21st century problem-based learning (PBL) in preclinical medical education is provided through a detailed explanation of the overall process, a description of PBL case construction, and a brief consideration of related activities, including case wrap-up sessions and facilitator debriefing meetings. Composition of student PBL groups, the role of the faculty facilitator, and PBL decorum are also explored in this chapter. The implementation of PBL in a new medical school curriculum by rational design is compared to the introduction of PBL into an existing medical school curriculum by retrofit. Advantages and challenges of PBL are enumerated; a brief comparison of PBL with team-based learning (TBL) is also included.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

As new medical schools continue to emerge in the United States, some will consider adopting problem-based learning (PBL) as a curriculum delivery modality in the first two years of undergraduate medical education. This decision will be in part or in toto as a rational design process. In contrast, retrofitting of PBL into existing undergraduate medical curricula is also under consideration or an on-going process at some U.S. medical schools. This rise in curricular PBL integration is in response to the requirement that medical schools undertake regular, broad curriculum reviews of content and delivery methods as part of continuous quality improvements. This integration aims to meet accreditation agency mandates for the provision of self-directed learning opportunities to enhance metacognition in adult learners by implementing active learning in a small group format.

The goal of this chapter is to explore the andragogy of PBL, providing a detailed account of the process as a curricular delivery method in undergraduate medical education. This chapter is not intended to provide data on student outcomes that can be directly ascribed to a PBL curriculum. Instead, the collective experience of the authors will be used to highlight considerations specific to the implementation and utilization of PBL in either a rational design or a retrofit scenario. Chapter objectives are intended to provide the following:

  • Historical Background: An outline of PBL in undergraduate medical education with an emphasis on its use in the 21st century

  • PBL Process Overview: A description of the method of active, student-directed content acquisition

  • Analysis: PBL implementation by rational design vs. retrofit

  • Outline of Perceived Advantages of PBL: Advantages to undergraduate medical education and a delineation of challenges

  • Comparison of PBL to Team-Based Learning (TBL): Briefly comparing two active learning modalities used in undergraduate medical education

Top

Historical Perspective: Problem-Based Learning In 20Th And 21St Century Medical Education

PBL emerged in the second half of the 20th century at McMaster University School of Medicine in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada as a way to revitalize undergraduate medical education (Barrows, 1994; Gallagher, 1997; Norman & Schmidt, 1992). Although the philosophy informing PBL has remained recognizable since its inception, the pre-Internet era comprised a more challenging time in which to implement this self-directed instructional format. The advent of the Internet and the ever-expanding availability of online learning resources have greatly enhanced the feasibility of self-directed student learning in PBL and other curricular contexts (Pluta, Richards, & Mutnick, 2013).

By the early 21st century, a majority of U.S. allopathic medical schools were incorporating PBL, in varying degrees, into their preclinical curricula (Kinkade, 2005). As the second decade of the 21st century ends, new U.S. medical schools are creating preclinical PBL curricula by rational design (e.g., Carle Illinois College of Medicine). Other institutions are revising their educational strategies to incorporate PBL (e.g., California Northstate University College of Medicine).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Metacognition: Self-reflection regarding one’s own educational advancement, in other words learning about learning.

Active Learning: Any method that seeks student engagement by requiring students to assume responsibility for aspects of their own learning.

Problem-Based Learning (PBL): A small-group active learning modality in which students work through a problem together (e.g., a clinical case), identifying gaps in their knowledge, constructing learning objectives to address their knowledge gaps, researching identified topics, and presenting their findings to peers in their group and their faculty facilitator.

Andragogy: Adult learning (as opposed to pedagogy, which formally pertains to learning by children).

PBL Clinical Case: A real but deidentified case, or amalgamation of cases, that portrays a clinical problem via narrative, dialogue, medical examination, and lab and/or imaging results.

Team-Based Learning (TBL): A structured, small group active learning framework that involves preclass assignments or preparation by individuals followed by in-class readiness assurance tests (RATs) taken first as an individual (iRAT) and then as a group/team (tRAT). Thereafter, an extensive application phase occurs in which newly learned concepts are put into practice and discussed by the team and by the entire class.

Self-Directed Learning: Learning in which the student identifies gaps in her/his knowledge and seeks to correct those deficiencies by doing research, evaluating the quality of the new information sources, imparting the new information to peers, and receiving feedback from peers and faculty members.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset