A Model for Mind-Device Dialectic and the Future of Advertising in the Social Media Age

A Model for Mind-Device Dialectic and the Future of Advertising in the Social Media Age

Recep Yilmaz (Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey) and Nurdan Oncel Taskiran (Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3822-6.ch037
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

Every advertisement text has a specific impact on the mind of receivers. Just like a water-mill or wind mill, human mind develops a specific systematic interaction against different advertisement texts. This section focuses on how information presented and carried by different texts are built on human mind. The basic aim is to reveal how advertisement texts operate human mind. In this sense, the authors try to understand the impact of analogue media on our minds through discussing the nature of science, the way human mind operates, and the structure of mass communication means. On top of that, the authors visualize this interaction on a model. This model would not only make it possible for us to understand our interaction with analogue media but also would give clues about digital media. With these clues, it would be possible to make predictions about changing advertising environment, and accordingly the way of making more effective strategies and future of advertising sector.
Chapter Preview
Top

Knowledge And The Dialectics Of The Human Mind

Πάντα ῥεῖ; (Panta rhei); [Everything flows] (Heraclitus)

Motion is at the core of dialectical thinking (Hilav, 2012). In the case of the human mind, the concept of knowledge is defined in different ways in philosophy, sociology and psychology. Philosophers agree in distinguishing between knowledge in the first of these senses, and belief (Vesey & Foulkes, 1990, pp. 163-165). Sociology of knowledge is explained as “the study of how styles of expression and the character of ideas or systems of thought are related to different social contexts” (Bullock, Stallybrass & Trombley, 1988, pp. 457-458). In psychology, the most prevalent definition of knowledge is “the verified belief; dogmas and doctrines about the physical and social system (of human, society and culture); thoughts, hierarchy of principles; common things; whether it is innate or the experience gained, for the mental plane. In this sense, knowledge is close to what is meant by memory because the memory is the place for storing information” (Budak, 2005, pp. 129-130). However, all these definitions fail to provide us a full description within the circular frame of our study. To deal with a subject like mental construction of knowledge also requires the structure of its mechanism which provides us mental embodiment, as well as its nature.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset