Are We the Robots?: Man-Machine Integration

Are We the Robots?: Man-Machine Integration

Iolanda Pisotta (Neurological Rehabilitation Department A and Clinical and Research Movement Analysis Lab (CaRMA), IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Italy & Department of Psychology, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Italy) and Silvio Ionta (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETHZ), Switzerland & Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) & University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland)
Copyright: © 2014 |Pages: 20
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6094-6.ch005
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


We experience and interact with the world through our body. The founding father of computer science, Alan Turing, correctly realized that one of the most important features of the human being is the interaction between mind and body. Since the original demonstration that electrical activity of the cortical neurons can be employed to directly control a robotic device, the research on the so-called Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs) has impressively grown. For example, current BMIs dedicated to both experimental and clinical studies can translate raw neuronal signals into computational commands to reproduce reaching or grasping in artificial actuators. These developments hold promise for the restoration of limb mobility in paralyzed individuals. However, as the authors review in this chapter, before this goal can be achieved, several hurdles have to be overcome, including developments in real-time computational algorithms and in designing fully implantable and biocompatible devices. Future investigations will have to address the best solutions for restoring sensation to the prosthetic limb, which still remains a major challenge to full integration of the limb into the user's self-image.
Chapter Preview


At the beginning of the third millennium the development of a revolutionary approach to rehabilitation radically improved the integration between apparently separated fields of research and heavily reshaped the traditional intervention protocols. Building on the last century’s most promising technological innovations, this inspired trend confirmed the importance of neuroprosthetics as an interdisciplinary specialty aiming at merging advances in neuropsychology, cognitive neuroscience, and biomedical engineering for creating adaptive devices to overcome the impairments resulting from traumatic or degenerative loss of sensorimotor functionality.

Following long-established procedures, manual interventions have been widely employed in conventional rehabilitation protocols. However this approach is extremely task-specific and time-consuming for both patients and therapists, requires elaborate schemes, and depends drastically both on therapists’ experience and patients’ compliance (del-Ama et al., 2012). In addition, these procedures do not always address some of the most important features of a proper sensorimotor rehabilitation, including systematic control of feedback and difficulty (Popovic et al., 2003) and monitoring patients’ achievements (Dietz, 2009). Thanks to the most recent technological advances in mechanics, control, and attachment, neuroprosthetics has rapidly grown (Zlotolow and Kozin, 2012). Thus by increasing repeatability, automation, and quantification, robotic-assisted rehabilitation represents one possibility to solve these issues (Prange et al., 2006).

Despite the broad implementation of robotic devices in clinical practices (Marchal-Crespo and Reinkensmeyer, 2009), robotic assistance does not always cope with the difficulties of severe clinical conditions characterized by complete loss of body segments or neural connections, e.g. amputation or spinal cord injury, respectively. As some visionary artists imagined in forward-looking master pieces such as the song “The Robots” realized by the band Kraftwerk in 1978, pioneering studies showed that the signal originating from the neural activity in the brain can be recorded, encoded, and used to control external devices (Fetz and Finocchi, 1971; Fetz, 1969). This innovative methodology triggered a huge amount of scientific investigations and clinical applications, establishing in fact an innovative field in neuroprosthetics and a new era in rehabilitation. Thus the so-called Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs) have been applied to a wide collection of clinical conditions (Lebedev and Nicolelis, 2006) and radically transformed the expectations of both patients and medical doctors, quantitatively increasing the range of possibilities for coping with the patients’ needs and qualitatively improving the rehabilitation protocols. However before BMI techniques can be fully implemented into clinical environments, some important issues have to be clarified and further investigations are necessary.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: