Assessing Authentic Intellectual Work in Mathematics Tasks

Assessing Authentic Intellectual Work in Mathematics Tasks

Lesly Yahaira Rodríguez Martínez (Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Mexico), María Guadalupe Pérez Martínez (Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Mexico) and Adriana Mercado Salas (Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Mexico)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2026-9.ch009
OnDemand PDF Download:


This paper reports an analysis of the tasks included in the Mathematical Challenges book. The analysis was based on the proposals of the Authentic Intellectual Work (AIW). The purpose of the study focuses on assessing the potential of the mathematical challenges to promote in-depth and meaningful learning through the connection with different contexts, and other features including purpose, multiple-solution pathways, construction of knowledge and higher order thinking. Participants in this study were 3 elementary school teachers, 2 mathematics specialists and the authors of this paper; they assessed the Mathematical Challenges through a questionnaire based on specific rubrics. The study used a mixed methods approach. The analysis produced two main findings. First, challenges vary in their connections to students' lives according to the context they come from. Second, almost all mathematical challenges are related to the highest levels of others AIW criteria.
Chapter Preview


Tasks are essential for any learning processes. Students’ academic achievement is influenced by what happens in the classroom, by the interaction of teachers and students with the curriculum through learning tasks. However, it has been asserted that many of the tasks teachers offer to their students as part of the educational processes tend to focus on issues that do not stimulate active learning, since they require students to perform isolated exercises (Newmann, King & Carmichael, 2007).

Newmann and Wehlage (1993) note that in most classrooms it is possible to identify two persistent problems in relation to the type of tasks that teachers suggest students carry out: a) tasks that do not capitalize students’ learning potential and emphasize lower order thinking skills; and b) the lack of intrinsic meaning or value for students. The latter point means that tasks are only important for school context, and could be characterized as fictitious situations that could not represent a practical use outside the classroom.

These problems have also been recognized in the Mexican educational system. In order to face them, the current official curriculum has emphasized the importance of implementing tasks that promote meaningful and in-depth learning for students (SEP, 2011). Regarding mathematics education, a new official textbook series, “Desafíos matemáticos” (Mathematical Challenges), has been widely distributed with the aim of supporting the accomplishment of curriculum objectives. Indeed, it has been stated that its aim is to “support teaching practices and provide both teacher and students with attractive, useful, mysterious and clever mathematical challenges” to solve (SEP, 2012b, p. 7).

Free and widely distributed textbooks in Mexican basic education, printed by the Ministry of Education, have been found to be the main resource that guides teaching practices in other subjects (Larios, 2001; Shield, 2012). This means that teachers in their classrooms frequently implement tasks suggested in these textbooks; it also means that textbooks are seen as the most important tools in guiding teachers’ teaching. They are thus a major teaching tool and important learning experiences for students (Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, 2000, p. 10)

Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to analyze the tasks suggested in these textbooks, particularly their potential to promote in-depth and meaningful learning1. Criteria developed by the pedagogical perspective of Authentic Intellectual Work (Newmann &Wehlage, 1993; Newmann, Marks & Gamoran, 1996; Newmann, Lopez & Bryk, 1998) was used in the analysis of the tasks proposed in the “Desafíos matemáticos” textbook for sixth-grade in elementary school. This perspective postulates that tasks that have a value beyond school, which promote knowledge construction and are carried out through disciplined inquiry, lead to meaningful learning for students and improve their achievement.

Newmann, Lopez and Bryck (1998) argue that tasks tackled by students in their classrooms are the most direct evidence of their learning opportunities. Classroom activities were not analyzed in this project, however; since textbooks are an important reference for teaching practices, the tasks included in them might eventually become classroom activities.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Rubric: Assessment tool that integrates different levels of performance and their respective criteria.

Contextualization: Familiarizing a problem situation so that the foundation of the problem becomes clearer.

Mathematical Challenges: It refers to specific tasks and features that allow students to put into play different thinking skills.

Value Beyond School: It refers to the use and application of the knowledge acquired in school to apply outside of school.

Authentic Learning: It refers to a knowledge that can be applied at different problem situations inside and outside school.

Learning Opportunities: Involves the type of work (tasks and activities) that students must face to achieved knowledge.

Higher Order Thinking: It refers to the cognitive demand that problem.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: