Capacity Building Educator

Capacity Building Educator

Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 17
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-6528-8.ch007
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is a game changer for education and life as we have known it. The digital world seems to keep on giving and education spaces are constantly challenged to keep up. Ignoring the impact on daily life is not an option. Responsive education must find ways to guide and mentor young people towards ethical and wise actions. Decisions need to be considered and not reactive. Action learning theory is one strategy that can be adaptive to change. The critical element is a willingness from the education fraternity to engage with learners on practical sharing of knowledge and insightful options. Co-learning and developing communities of practice are preferred actions pedagogically and professionally.
Chapter Preview

“There are three elements in knowledge; the given …, the concept, and the act which interprets the one by means of the other.” — C.L. Lewis (1929)

Top

Education And Ai

One thing is certain in the artificial intelligence (AI) and augmented intelligence (IA) age, pedagogical theory and action are under siege. Pressure to keep up with everyday life and changes in the street is mounting at school and university gates. Once the cloistered spaces for learning, education institutions can no longer shut the doors on outsiders. Technology and the Internet are the backdrop of everything happening in global transactions. In the post-pandemic world both teacher and student have entered a different life and need to renegotiate the pedagogical canon. Blocking invasive kinds of software and mobile internet linked devices from educational settings seems pointless and time wasting. How to manage the evolving AI world within some kind of controlled setting is the reality point. The ‘problem’ is not going away nor is it easily fixed. How to juxtapose educational curriculums on this connected global landscape is the dilemma. Undeniably the AI dynamic makes life difficult for educators. Open mindedness and acceptance of change can be a scary phenomenon and facing this evolving force requires courage and conviction. Regardless of position, ideas must be the starting point.

With the issues noted as the backdrop the aim of this chapter is to drill down into the relationship between teacher and student. The starting point could be a round table discussion conducted in multiple settings. The place could be a school, university, or training college. It doesn’t matter as the issues will be similar. Taking a drone’s view of the various groups and recording their conversations will likely reveal a process. Speculatively speaking several steps will be noted. First, assertive voices will attempt to establish their turf and its priority in any outcome. Second, after coffee and some heated discussion there may emerge a more conciliatory approach and willingness to consider alternative views. Third, having grasped the options the group members may move to a more cooperative phase and attempt to find consensus. Fourth, having reached consensus the next step is to design a plan of action. Fifth, the group agrees to implement the plan and meet regularly to review and adjust as needed. What these steps describe Etienne Wenger (1999) terms developing a community of practice (see Figure 1). Implicit in this process is consensus as a mandatory driver for effective and sustainable change. The process is dynamic, pragmatic and helps shift intransigent thinking. Bonds formed can scaffold the teachers’ need for support during a period of what are acknowledged monumental changes within the profession.

Figure 1.

Developing a community of practice

978-1-6684-6528-8.ch007.f01

AI might be the post pandemic attention grabber. However, navigating the learning terrain has multiple hazards and turning points. The curriculum is the likely to head the list. Written by experts and the product of numerous committees and policy makers, curriculums generally appear as non-negotiable dictates for the teaching and learning content. In most countries schooling for children is compulsory. The culminating hurdle will be some form of external assessment, the outcome of which can determine the next life steps for the student. Considering how to meet the curriculum requirements and attempt to incorporate elements of the digital age is all the more reason for institutions to encourage communities of practice. Colleagues can share their expertise, collaboratively negotiate, and implement changes. Through this process capacity building takes place. There is a mechanism in place for focussing on external forces such as AI. This builds confidence and the basis for a future pedagogy.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset