Capturing Educator Voices: Graduate Students Tackle Twenty-First Century Literacy Challenges in an Online Environment

Capturing Educator Voices: Graduate Students Tackle Twenty-First Century Literacy Challenges in an Online Environment

Anne Katz (Armstrong State University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3873-8.ch015


According to Albert Einstein, “It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in creative expression and knowledge.” This quote illustrates my online teaching philosophy as I work to mentor graduate-level educators, deepening their knowledge of how to best facilitate their students' abilities to tackle twenty-first century literacy demands. Through designing and teaching online courses for a fully online Reading Specialist M.Ed. program as well as for students pursuing an M.Ed. in Early Childhood Education or a Reading Endorsement, I have evolved as an online educator committed to inspire student success. This chapter will present the reader with strategies to create an online learning environment where students are provided with authentic opportunities to apply research-based approaches and modes of developing their pupils' literacy, communication, and critical thinking skills through innovative means.
Chapter Preview


Through designing and teaching online courses for a fully online Reading Specialist M.Ed. program as well as for students pursing a Reading Endorsement or M.Ed. in Early Childhood Education, this chapter will detail successful strategies of an online educator. It is important to offer a range of opportunities for learners to discuss, evaluate, and synthesize information and to “think creatively about your content” (Christopher, 2015, p. 168). This chapter will explore faculty-to-student and student-to-student interaction in a fully online program— including discussion boards, announcements, email, individual/group work, and feedback on assignments— in order to create a framework to facilitate effective online learning experiences. An interactive instructional style combined with meaningful assessment practices will allow faculty to better prepare students for the demands of twenty-first century teaching.

The Master of Education in Reading Specialist Education program provides a comprehensive study of the teaching of reading and writing to students throughout the grade levels. It is geared to address the Common Core Georgia Performance Standards that emphasize literacy skills across content areas. The program is aligned with the International Literacy Association Standards among other professional organizations. Coursework is designed to develop Reading Specialists who possess a deep understanding of research-based practices for improving literacy skills and serve the literacy skills needs of a broad spectrum of constituencies. The program supports efforts to increase the literacy skills of the area’s labor force. Kentner (2015) states that “maybe it’s time we rethink the image of our students reading into something that better fits the world they live in” (p. 640). These tenets guide my work with these educators as I design learning experiences throughout the fully online Reading Specialist M.Ed program.

The program consists of 11 online courses totaling 34 semester hours in a cohort format. I have designed five of these courses, including the three Foundation courses (Understanding Readers and the Reading Process, Linking Literacy Assessment to Instruction, and Reading Instruction in the Content Areas) as well as two specialized courses (Diagnosis and Correction of Reading Difficulties and the Capstone Project). Assignments are varied in order to ensure that students are immersed in a range of meaningful learning opportunities. These include the following: an emergent literacy case study, Diverse Literature Research Project, Response-to-Intervention paper based upon a professional journal article and students’ own experiences with the process, a literacy assessment project, content-area literature presentation, professional journal presentation, comprehensive case study of a struggling reader, and a professional video update of an action research project. Students are also encouraged to particulate in the university-sponsored Student Scholar Symposium or submit work to a professional journal and/or conference presentation.

A common thread throughout all of the coursework is the ability to impact assessment and instructional practices in the classroom as well as throughout the school. Connecting expanding definitions of literacy in the broad context of students’ lives with literacy instruction in our schools may require that teachers re-evaluate and transform their own understandings about literacy and their approaches to instruction (Albers, Vasquez, & Harste, 2008; Cowan & Albers, 2006; Spitler, 2009). Therefore, as teacher educators, it also becomes our responsibility to design learning experiences that support this ongoing transformation of teacher literacy identity (Spitler, 2009).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Writing To Learn: A valuable performance assessment tool for the professor to check course understanding.

Self-Efficacy: Individual’s belief in one's ability to succeed in specific situations.

Discussion Board: An online forum for students to generate, converse, and implement ideas as well as reflect upon issues presented in the course.

Differentiation: Adapt instruction based upon students’ interests, learning styles, and readiness, which are critical elements to consider in address the diverse needs of online graduate students.

University-School Collaboration: A partnership with a defined goal between a university and a school, that enriches both parties through the exchange of resources/ideas.

Motivation: Strategies for encouraging authentic participation in the online classroom.

Andragogical Model: An adult learning theory that influenced the design, planning, and implementation of the online classroom environment.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: