The Case for Open Access Networks

The Case for Open Access Networks

Don Flournoy (Ohio University, USA), Rolland LeBrasseur (Laurentian University, Canada ) and Sylvie Albert (Laurentian University, Canada)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-575-9.ch010
OnDemand PDF Download:
List Price: $37.50


Efforts to keep the broadband Internet a free and open public utility are much in the news. In the context of the Network Society, the authors examine some of the publicly stated arguments and positions being taken in the articulation of “net neutrality” and “open source” practices and principles. The article explores the difficult technical challenges present in maintaining “open access” telecommunications networks using proprietary technologies. From a global perspective, industry groups have strong incentives to work together to adopt universal technical standards. With more open technical standards, open source applications and products can be accelerated and made more pervasive. Collaboration among businesses, national governments, and public sectors are seen as key to implementing policies that lead to public participation in economic and social development both locally and globally. The principal means by which all these approaches can be sustained is to keep the Internet accessible, free and open for all.
Chapter Preview

Development Of The Network Society

The Network Society is a dependent social structure using interconnecting digital technologies to process and distribute information (Castells, 2006, p. 7). In essence, the Network Society makes use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to gain greater openness, adaptability and flexibility for itself. Despite Castells’ optimistic view of the Network Society, he has encouraged policy makers to reflect before acting:

…the key question is how to proceed to maximize the changes for fulfilling the collective and individual projects that express social needs and values under the new structural conditions (p. 16).

An important component of the Network Society is the network economy in which knowledge and other intangible assets have become the most important productive factor (Mandeville, 2005). Intangible assets include intellectual property, human and social capital, information economics, brand names, customer databases, core competencies, and business relationships. Organizations operate in a network of relationships and alliances that allow them to compete and innovate. They practice both collaboration and competition, and emphasize openness with close partners and limited proprietary access with competitors and customers. In other words, for-profit organizations may argue for controlled access to networks to generate revenues and maintain a competitive advantage. It depends on where these organizations are located in the Internet structures (Barry, 2008) and where elements of true competition exist.

Castells and followers have tended to view global forces as dominant, with nation states and regional bodies serving as powerful players through their legislative and regulatory powers and public sectors (Castells & Cardoso, 2006). However, other stakeholders (civil liberty groups, industry associations, organizations for disabled people and trade unions) attempt to influence the dominant players (Skogerbo & Storsul, 2000). Equally true is the decision-making that takes place at the local community level which is tied not just to technology and economy, but also to social well-being and basic community values (Jain, Mandviwalla & Banker, 2007). Numerous such examples are supplied by the Intelligent Community Forum, a non-profit think tank and promoter of the broadband economy in local communities throughout the world ( Thus, the policy decisions that shape the Internet impact on all levels of social and economic organization.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: