Comparison of Student Achievement and Problem-Solving Techniques for Integration Between Online and Face-to-Face Calculus Courses

Comparison of Student Achievement and Problem-Solving Techniques for Integration Between Online and Face-to-Face Calculus Courses

Sarah Ferguson
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1476-4.ch010
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Understanding the learning online students acquire through online course experiences is important as online course options and availability continue to expand. This study seeks to compare problem-solving techniques and course learning outcomes of Calculus students through the comparison of work completed by online and face-to-face Calculus students. Four assessment questions, regarding integration, will be reviewed in an effort to distinguish commonalities and/or differences in understanding and problem-solving strategies deployed by online and face-to-face Calculus students. Statistical analyses of question scores will include usage of Levene's test, Welch test, Brown-Forsythe test, and F-test. A qualitative analysis will also be conducted to analyze problem-solving strategies used by the online and face-to-face Calculus students.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

Allen and Seaman (2014) have been conducting a multi-year study to track the growth of online learning, explore the strategicness of colleges and universities offering online learning options, and investigate student learning outcomes as a result of taking online courses. When their study began in 2002, Allen and Seaman found 1.6 million students were enrolled in at least one online course. In their most recent report, Allen and Seaman commented 7.1 million students embarked on online learning experiences in 2012. This 16.1% annual growth rate in online enrollments dwarfs the 2.5% annual growth rate experienced by overall higher education enrollments from 2002 to 2012 and equates to 33.5% of all higher education students taking at least one online course (Allen & Seaman, 2014).

In addition to online course enrollments increasing, faculty buy-in to the quality of online learning opportunities has also improved. Figure 1 shows a steady increase in faculty perception of online education quality. Allen and Seaman (2014) reported 77% of academic leaders at colleges believed equivalent to or superior learning outcomes were being produced by online education relative to face-to-face instruction. At the onset of their study of online education and its inception into the higher education spectrum, Allen and Seaman found only 53% of academic leaders saw online instruction as on par with face-to-face instruction.

Figure 1.

Online learning quality

978-1-7998-1476-4.ch010.f01
(Allen & Seaman, 2014)

Key Terms in this Chapter

Problem-Solving: The ways in which students solved or attempted to solve instructor posed questions.

Online Learning: Learning through technological devices that utilize internet connectedness to access course material and content.

Blended Learning: Utilizing a combination of online and face-to-face learning techniques.

Integration: Calculus content used to evaluate area under a curve.

Integration by Parts: Integration technique which uses u, v, du , and dv value assignments in order to rewrite and solve specific integration questions.

Integration by Substitution: Integration technique which uses u , and du value assignments in order to rewrite and solve specific integration questions.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset