Comprehensive Literacy Coaching: Content, Pedagogical, Political, and Professional Knowledge

Comprehensive Literacy Coaching: Content, Pedagogical, Political, and Professional Knowledge

Melissa A. Parenti (St. John's University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0669-0.ch005
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

Built upon the seminal work of Lee Shulman's (1987) CPK framework for preparing teachers, the Content, Pedagogical, Political, and Professional Knowledge (CPPPK) model is designed as a tool for training literacy coaches in PK–12 settings. Whether through case review, role-play, or embedded practice, the CPPPK framework allows preservice literacy coaches to engage with problems of practice linked to content, pedagogy, policy, and professionalism. This tailored practice and ample rehearsal-based education equips literacy coaches with the flexibility in theory and interpersonal talents to address and assist in all variables linked to coaching that results in improved student achievement.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

According to Walpole and Blamey (2008), literacy coaches view themselves as supporting change at the school level and at the mentor level (p. 228). It is this balance of serving as quasi school-level administrator and teacher mentor that truly sets apart strong literacy coaches from those less effective. Toggling between administrative work and conversations, while offering support and advice to teacher peers, demands strong ethics and interpersonal talent. A literacy coach may find themselves in a meeting with a principal who notes the struggles and concerns related to a classroom teacher’s practice, and, shortly after, that literacy coach may find themselves in that teacher’s classroom demonstrating or co-teaching a lesson designed to assist in advancing the teacher’s pedagogy or understanding of content.

This scenario presents just one of the challenges of literacy coaching in a high-stakes era. This situation also requires confidentiality on both ends—protecting the principal’s voiced concerns, while preserving the classroom teacher’s thoughts. A literacy coach graduates from a master’s program with “knowledge of practice” (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1999) or the understanding of content and pedagogy to tackle this task with ease. Yet it is the application of this knowledge base coupled with political and professional dexterity that will determine the effectiveness of the literacy coach.

Application of knowledge and new skills plays a vital role in teaching development, thus including rehearsal of these interpersonal political and professional encounters described above is essential when preparing future literacy coaches. It is critical that literacy coaches are provided with models of how such complexities play out in actual professional teaching and learning settings. The realities of these settings are described as greatly varying educational contexts (Neumerski, 2013; Shulman, 1987). Literacy coach preparation, therefore, must mirror and provide what Cochran-Smith and Lytle (1999) refer to as “knowledge in practice.” When this knowledge in practice is present, new theory or content is able to be situated in reality and in the politics and authenticity of a professional landscape. This hands-on experience becomes a tool for increased learning (Dewey, 1897). Dewey refers to these constructive activities as the center of correlation allowing for the ideal correlation of theory and practice (Dewey, 1897, p. 164).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset