Discussion and Conclusion

Discussion and Conclusion

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8494-4.ch006
Chapter PDF Download
Open access chapters are freely available for download

Abstract

The purpose of Section 2 is to consider management approaches to build and operate a regional system for facilitating the self-organization process of cross-sectoral collaborations to promote competitive regional industries. The review of the theoretical study in Chapter 4 derives the conceptual model. The case study in Chapter 5 examines the cases of building and operating a regional system toward promoting competitive regional industries in the three states in Germany. In this chapter, based on the conceptual model, the result of the case study is comparatively analyzed and clarifies the similarities and differences between the cases. Then, focusing on each case with a process tracing approach, events observed in understanding the initial condition and building/operating the regional system are chronologically clarified, and the causal mechanism is examined. Finally, the validity of the conceptual model is considered based on the findings, and implications are discussed.
Chapter Preview
Top

Comparative Analysis Of The Three Cases

The case study about the three states in Chapter 5 shows the difference in paths to build the regional systems, their structures, and manners of operations between the states.

However, it is commonly found in all cases that the self-organization process for cross-sectoral collaboration is initiated by industry and academia; then, the cluster organization supports the process by providing the platform and services. Moreover, the public sector (i.e., the state government) takes the lead in understanding the initial conditions, builds/strengthens the regional system, then supports and directs cluster organizations.

In the following section, by focusing on the similarities and differences, the results of the case study are discussed based on the conceptual model.

Understanding Initial Conditions and Exploring Own Solutions

Similarity Between the Cases

In the 1990s, all the state governments recognized the concept of “cluster.” They pursued strengthening innovation capability and increasing the competitiveness of regional industry by facilitating cross-sectoral collaborations. They considered their own approach to implementing the cluster program by conducting a survey and learning from the regional stakeholders. In other words, the process for understanding initial conditions and exploring their own solution was not only played by the government but also by the involvement of regional stakeholders in industry and academia, etc. (the two subsystems).

Difference Between the Cases

Although the commonality was found as above, the process of interaction between the state government and regional stakeholders for understanding the initial conditions differs between the cases. These were promoted by experiencing a precedent program (NRW) or gradually/experimentally implementing policies (Bavaria, BW).

In NRW, reflecting and learning from the precedent experience of Objective 2 programme was the basis for launching the cluster program in 2007. Turning to the movement of medical technology, the survey was conducted by the state government with the participation of the local cluster organizations, then building and operating state-wide structure was considered through the interaction among them.

In contrast, in Bavaria, after the foundation of Bayern Innovativ in 1995, policies were implemented gradually with trial and error and learning through dialog with regional stakeholders (including learning about activities of the industrial networks in the state). Moreover, a study/survey was conducted to consider how their cluster program should be in the state. Then, a full-fledged cluster program was launched in 2006. In BW, the state government surveyed the strength and weakness of the state, and the cluster program was launched in 2006. Considering the state’s dispersed structure of industrial distribution, the policy was started by recognizing the activities of local clusters. Measures were gradually introduced through interaction between the state government and regional stakeholders. Then, the present structure was established with the foundation of Cluster Agency BW in 2014.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset