e-Research, a way of Learning Together?

e-Research, a way of Learning Together?

Paolo Diviacco (Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale (OGS), Italy)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9556-6.ch011
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


The aim of this chapter is to compare the two worlds of science and learning in the perspective to find commonalties that could be used to develop new methods and technologies to better support collaborative and on-line scientific research. In this perspective we claim the existence of a convergence of these two domains and highlight similarities in on-line tools that support such activities. At the same time, we bring attention to the fact that a largely overlooked aspect of existing on-line scientific collaborative research systems, which is instead well represented in learning systems, is communication among partners. To address this issue we build a collaborative on-line software tool that allows to make some interesting early observations. Further on, we report on the introduction of a discourse structuring facility that could be used, on one hand, to ease the use of communication tools and on the other as a boundary object: an artifact that allows to bridge different paradigms and backgrounds.
Chapter Preview



The Encyclopædia Britannica defines Science as: any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation.

In the traditional vision, science coincides with truth. This happens because scientific research is an activity that is supposed to be objective (unbiased), meaning that it is supposed to be founded on facts and logic.

This has been demonstrated to be hardly the case.

Science is not objective. Even in the perspective of the analytical tradition (Searle 2008, Diviacco 2015) the term objective is translated as “not just from someone‘s point of view”. It essentially means that what is stated is not private, that, on the contrary, it is public, meaning that it is inevitably defined by the interactions of the members of a community. Quoting Latour and Woolgar (1979) “Science is a Social Construct”.

Within the same perspective, facts and opinions themselves cannot be easily (or maybe at all) distinguished. To say that something is a fact would require the possibility to state its metaphysically objective condition. Metaphysical objectivity refers to properties of things that do not depend on experience for their existence (Diviacco 2015). This of course is something rather difficult to determine for anyone of us. What we normally try to achieve, instead, is the form of epistemological objectivity we described above, where a community finds a convergence towards a “state of affairs”. This latter is not a fact, since it is epistemic, but at the same time it is not an opinion, since it is not only private. It is a merely possible situation that can be expressed by any non-contradictory true or false sentence

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: