Engaging a Workbench Dialectic Inquiry Model in an Online Master's Degree Program: TPACK Development Through Communities of Inquiry

Engaging a Workbench Dialectic Inquiry Model in an Online Master's Degree Program: TPACK Development Through Communities of Inquiry

Henry Gillow-Wiles (Southern Oregon University, USA) and Margaret L. Niess (Oregon State University, USA)
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 23
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7001-1.ch013
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


This cross-case descriptive study suggests a model for designing online courses that supports TPACK development through communities of inquiry. Borrowing from the world of science research literature, a workbench dialectic inquiry model was engaged in designing a small group-large group dynamic. Mimicking scientists at the workbench, the participants formed relationships in small groups to develop ideas about TPACK, presented their ideas to the larger, whole-class group, then returned to the small groups to integrate feedback. This dynamic group interaction structure provided the participants with the space to develop their TPACK thinking in ways that supported the transition to cognitive discourse. Analysis of the forum postings revealed the complexity of the participant interaction and suggested that facilitating student community engagement supported the development of their TPACK. Course design details are provided. Further research directions might include applying the workbench dialectic inquiry model in other educational contexts and with larger student populations.
Chapter Preview


The nature of an online environment creates limitations to the interactions students depend on to navigate the tasks associated with learning. Critiques of online education often focus on issues of reduced student satisfaction, perceived isolation, and inability to form the supporting relationships often found in face-to-face learning experiences (Jaggars, 2014; Valenzuela, Fisher, Whale, & Adapa, 2013). Literature provides insight into the development of a variety of pedagogies and strategies where community building is facilitated through leveraging different technologies. Real-time, interactive technologies such as instant messaging applications and streaming video applications have been utilized to provide a semblance of immediacy, where students are able to form relationships and collaborate in learning communities (Kim, Glassman, Meredith, & Morris, 2015). Other research has investigated how text-based, asynchronous technologies, such as forums, can provide an environment where students are able to form communities of inquiry where they might engage in meaningful discussions and build their knowledge (Kovanović, Gašević, Joksimović, Hatala, & Adesope, 2015; Niess & Gillow-Wiles, 2013).

Regardless of the technologies used, one recurring theme throughout the literature is the need for instructors to be proactive in how they facilitate the formation and development of online learning communities (Akyol & Garrison, 2008; Cho, 2011; Garrison & Akyol, 2013; Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2001; Hew, 2015; Niess & Gillow-Wiles, 2013; Rubin, Fernandes, & Avgerinou, 2012; Swan & Shih, 2005; Tucker, Willis, Blocher, & de Montes, 2002). Leaving students to fend for themselves in forming relationships often results in a continuation of students’ perceptions of isolation and lack of connections with other students and the instructor (Phirangee, Epp, & Hewitt, 2016; Jackson, Jones, & Rodriguez, 2010).

Targeted, structured course design is essential for students to transcend the sparse online learning environment and realize the strengths and opportunities available in a digitally mediated context (Costley, 2016). Purposeful course design providing students with opportunities to engage with other students and the instructor in creating their knowledge gives students a sense of place and belonging that increases their satisfaction and their success (McDaniels, Pfund, & Barnicle, 2016). One potentially useful model for designing courses that support student engagement is the dialectical model of inquiry found in the science community, referred to as a ‘workbench model’. This model suggests potential insights for online course structures and activities supporting students in both the creation of communities of inquiry and in the creation of an individual and shared knowledge. These communities of inquiry might also provide the motivation, communication, and structure necessary to sustain individual inquiry (Magnusson, Palincsar, & Templin, 2004).

The weaknesses and drawbacks of situating learning in an online environment create a need for a supported, instructor-created learning trajectory where social presence is established to facilitate cognitive presence (Chiu, Hsu, & Wang, 2006). The structure provided by the workbench dialectic model potentially provides a framework for students to engage in the kind of organic interactions that develop social presence while serving as a pathway to transition social conversations into cognitive discourse.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Student Engagement: How students interact with the instructor, the content, technology, the learning environment, and other students as they individually and collaboratively explore new ideas and create new knowledge.

Blackboard: Virtual online platform that supports learner engagement, interaction, and learning through technology and educational services.

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The knowledge from the interaction and integration of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge that teachers rely on for teaching their subject matter with technologies. This knowledge is typically referred to as TPACK.

Online Learning: Planned educational experiences where technology plays a critical role in both the teaching and learning for learners at a distance rather than in face-to-face exchanges but in virtual exchanges of ideas. The challenge for instruction is to design the environment in ways that encourage learner interaction.

Community Of Inquiry: A group of individuals involved in inquiry into problematic ideas. An essential component is the requirement for agreement among those involved in the process of inquiry for legitimacy.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: