ENISA Study: Challenges in Securing Industrial Control Systems

ENISA Study: Challenges in Securing Industrial Control Systems

Rafal Leszczyna, Elyoenai Egozcue
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2659-1.ch005
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In 2011, the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) conducted a study in the domain of Industrial Control Systems (ICS). Its objective was to obtain the current view on the ICS protection primarily in Europe but also in the international context. The ‘portrait’ included threats, risks, and challenges in the area of ICS protection as well as national, pan European, and international initiatives on ICS security. The study was performed through desktop research, survey and interviews, and a meeting with all involved stakeholders. This chapter highlights the most relevant parts of the final report of the study. It focuses on the challenges to securing ICS identified during the research, but also presents the context and the methodology of the study. In response to the challenges, the seven recommendations of ENISA for protecting ICS are proposed.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Industrial Control Systems (ICS) are command and control networks and systems designed to support industrial processes (Igure, Laughter, & Williams, 2006). These systems are responsible for monitoring and controlling a variety of processes and operations such as gas and electricity distribution, water treatment, oil refining or railway transportation. The largest subgroup of ICS is SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems. Industrial control systems constitute a strategic asset of critical infrastructures.

Since the potential for catastrophic terrorist attacks that affect critical infrastructures is increasing (Commission of the European Communities, 2004), in 2004 a series of actions were launched to address this issue. These activities were driven by the European Commission, the Council and the Justice and Home Affairs Council and resulted in the adoption of the conclusions of a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP) (Commission of the European Communities, 2006) by the Council of the European Union, in April 2007. The key element of EPCIP is the Directive on the Identification and Designation of European Critical Infrastructures (Commission of the European Communities, 2008). In parallel, the information security issues for vital infrastructures in Europe are addressed by The Digital Agenda for Europe (DAE) (Commission of the European Communities, 2010) and the CIIP action plan (Commission of the European Communities, 2009).

Recognising the importance of assuring the security of industrial control systems in the protection of critical infrastructures, in 2011 the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) launched a series of activities, which aimed at bringing together the relevant stakeholders and engaging them into an open discussion on ICS protection. The principal goal of the open dialogue was to identify the main concerns regarding the security of ICS1 as well as to recognize and support national, pan European and international initiatives on ICS security. The involved stakeholders included ICS security tools and services providers, ICS software/hardware manufactures and integrators, infrastructure operators, public bodies, standardisation bodies and academia, R&D.

Furthermore, in order to help the stakeholders get a deeper insight on the issue, ENISA decided to further explore this problem by delivering a research and survey-based study on this topic. The objective of the study was to obtain the current perspective of ICS protection primarily in Europe, but also in the international context. This view includes threats, risks and challenges in the area of ICS protection as well as national, pan European and international initiatives on ICS security.

The outcomes of the study were gathered into the report “Protecting Industrial Control Systems: ENISA Recommendations” (ENISA, 2011), which is divided into the main part (the main report) and 5 annexes. The main report summarises the results of the study, while the annexes contain the detailed information on the results. Annex I presents the main results coming from a desktop research phase. It provides a comprehensive overview of the current panorama of ICS security. Annex II provides a detailed analysis of the data gathered from the interviews and the survey in which ICS security experts participated. Annex III is a compilation of current security guidelines and standards for ICS.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset