Factors Leading to a Quality E-Learning Experience

Factors Leading to a Quality E-Learning Experience

David Lewis (University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA) and Edward Chen (University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-830-7.ch008
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


The Internet became available to the general public in the mid 1990’s. At that time, a few institutions starting using the net as a vehicle for providing course credit. Since this early time, the number of institutions offering classes and full degrees online has grown exponentially. At one northeastern institution, the growth has been from 4 courses in 1996 to over 500 courses today. At the same time, most institutions now have updated their classrooms with ever more sophisticated technical capabilities, such as access to the Web for presentations, synchronous videos, and clickers for taking class polls. Others use technology as an add-on to the class room creating hybrid, blended, or e-learning experiences. In the late 90’s classes were primarily text based, using either in house developed web pages, and later using self contained course management shells such as WebCT and Blackboard, which required the users to create content, but the linkages and communication tools were self contained. Some authors have developed taxonomies to look at quality [media richness, student interaction, etc.], but not enough has been done to compare online learning and e-learning to traditional classroom based learning. The contribution of this paper will be to report on the findings of previous studies relating to the assessment of online course delivery and the online component of blended learning classes. The results of the research findings should provide significant contributions to the performance improvement of e-learning.
Chapter Preview

Learning Theory

Curriculum design, combined with learning theory, defines how individuals learn and how instruction should be conducted to optimize the knowledge acquisition. There are two major learning theories that have influenced most modern teaching practices: behavioral learning theory and cognitive learning theory. With the development of learning environment and the focus of learning, several new theories have been established. Some are critical to the e-learning instruction and curriculum design.

Behavioral Learning Theory

Behavioral learning theory developed largely from Skinner’s model (1968) that learning is measured as change in an individual’s behavior. Behavioral learning theory focuses on modifying the learner’s behavior and provides instruction that involves a presentation of information, a question to seek a response from the learner, feedback to the learner’s response, and either positive reinforcement for a correct answer or a repeat of the cycle to learn correctly. A sequence of instructions is designed to assist learner to acquire more complex skill through broken down component skills. Mastery of the smaller units is a prerequisite for the larger units, and these gradual steps foster student success (Gagne & Briggs, 1979).

The behavioral learning model is best seen in objectivist methodology such as in direct lecture, where the objective is to have the student acquire and repeat factual information. According to the objectivist view, objects have intrinsic meaning, and knowledge is mirroring the reality. Jonassen (1991) defines objectivism, as that knowledge is stable because the essential attributes of objects are knowable and relatively unchanging. The fundamental metaphysical assumption of objectivism is that the world is real, it is structured, and structure can be modeled for the learner. It assumes that individual can acquire the understanding of the objects, and this understanding can be accomplished when rational structures or systematic rules are used to draw conclusions (Winograd & Flores, 1986). Since lecture is the main objectivist methodology, teacher acts as a “Sage on the Stage” rather than a mentor or a coach, teacher passes on knowledge to students in class and interacts with students to clarify misunderstanding so that true knowledge transfer can be completed (Jonassen, Davidson, Collins, Campbell, & Haag, 1995; Leidner & Jarvenpaa, 1995).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: