Flexible Blind Signal Separation in the Complex Domain

Flexible Blind Signal Separation in the Complex Domain

Michele Scarpiniti (University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy), Daniele Vigliano (University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy), Raffaele Parisi (University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy) and Aurelio Uncini (University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-214-5.ch012
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter aims at introducing an Independent Component Analysis (ICA) approach to the separation of linear and nonlinear mixtures in complex domain. Source separation is performed by an extension of the INFOMAX approach to the complex environment. The neural network approach is based on an adaptive activation function, whose shape is properly modified during learning. Different models have been used to realize complex nonlinear functions for the linear and the nonlinear environment. In nonlinear environment the nonlinear functions involved during the learning are implemented by the so-called splitting functions, working on the real and the imaginary part of the signal. In linear environment instead, the generalized splitting function which performs a more complete representation of complex function is used. Moreover a simple adaptation algorithm is derived and several experimental results are shown to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

In the last years Blind Source Separation (BSS) realized through Independent Component Analysis (ICA) have raised great interest in the signal processing community (Cichocki & Amari, 2002; Haykin, 2000; Roberts & Everson, 2001). In this context the neural network approach (Haykin, 1999) (usually based on a single layer perceptron (SLP) or a multilayer perceptron (MLP)) seems to be one of the preferred methodologies (Jutten & Herault, 1991; Bell & Sejnowski, 1995); this interest is justified by the large number of different approaches and applications. As a matter of fact, in several fields, from multimedia to telecommunication and to biomedicine, ICA is currently employed to effectively recover the original sources from their mixtures or to remove interfering signals from the signal of interest. Initial studies on ICA aimed at solving the well-known cocktail party problem, in a instantaneous or slightly reverberant environment. Pioneering works in ICA appeared at the beginning of the 90’s, when Jutten and Herault (1991) presented their “neurometric architecture” and Comon (1994) published his often referenced work.

Recently the problem of source separation has been extended to the complex domain (Cardoso & Laheld, 1996; Fiori, Uncini & Piazza, 1999; Bingham & Hyvärinen, 2000), due to the need of frequency domain signal processing which is quite common in telecommunication (Benvenuto, Marchesi, Piazza & Uncini, 1991) and biomedical applications (Calhoun, Adali, Pearlson & Pekar, 2002b; Calhoun, Adali, Pearlson, Van Zijl & Pekar, 2002c). One of the most critical issues in ICA is the matching between the probability density function (or pdf) of sources (usually unknown) and the algorithm’s parameters (Yang & Amari, 1997). In this way one of the most important issues in designing complex neural networks consists in the definition of the complex activation function (Clarke, 1990; Benvenuto & Piazza, 1992; Kim & Adali, 2001a). In order to improve the pdf matching for the learning algorithm, the so called Flexible ICA was recently introduced in (Choi, Cichocki & Amari, 2000; Fiori, 2000; Solazzi, Piazza & Uncini, 2000a; Vigliano & Uncini, 2003; Vigliano, Parisi & Uncini, 2005). Flexible ICA is the approach in which the activation function (AF) of the neural network is adaptively modified during the learning. This approach provides faster and more accurate learning by estimating the parameters related to the pdf of signals. In literature it is possible to find several methods based on polynomials (Amari, Cichocki & Yang, 1996) and on parametric function approaches (Pham, Garrat & Jutten, 1992; Solazzi, Piazza & Uncini, 2001).

Moreover the main properties that the complex activation function should satisfy (Kim & Adali, 2002a; Vitagliano, Parisi & Uncini, 2003) are that it should be non linear and bounded and its partial derivatives should exist and be bounded. Unfortunately the analytic and boundedness characteristics are in contrast with the Liouville theorem (Clarke, 1990; Kim & Adali, 2001a). In other words, according to this theorem, an activation function should be bounded almost everywhere in the complex domain (Clarke, 1990; Leung & Haykin, 1991; Georgiou & Koutsougeras, 1992; Kim & Adali, 2000, 2001a, 2002b; Adali, Kim & Calhoun, 2004).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset