From Telecytology to Mobile Cytopathology: Past, Present, and Future

From Telecytology to Mobile Cytopathology: Past, Present, and Future

Abraham Pouliakis, Stavros Archondakis, Niki Margari, Petros Karakitsos
Copyright: © 2016 |Pages: 22
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9861-1.ch012
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Cytopathology is a popular discipline since George Papanicolaou proposed the famous test pap about 60 years ago. Today modern cytopathology laboratories still use the microscope as the primary diagnostic device and additionally they host modalities performing medical tests and exchange data via networks and have imaging systems producing pictures and virtual slides; the volume of produced data nowadays is enormous. Simultaneously mobile phones and tablets have evolved; their capabilities compete desktop computers and have the advantage of being always connected and at the side of users. Despite there are rather limited applications relevant to cytopathology for the mobile device, there is potential for uses in numerous activities of the cytopathology laboratory, including and not limited to: training, reporting, diagnosis and consultation, laboratory management, whole slide imaging, interactions between patient-doctor, doctor-doctor and within the laboratory personnel, quality control and assurance. Mobile devices can offer important benefits to the modern cytopathology laboratory.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Mobile Health (mHealth) is the practice of medicine and public health supported by mobile devices. The use of mobile computing and communication devices, such as mobile phones, tablet computers and personal digital assistants (PDAs), by health professionals, is nowadays rapidly growing. The mHealth applications are mainly used for collecting community and clinical health data, delivery of healthcare information, real-time monitoring of patient vital signs, and direct healthcare provisioning. In more detail, handheld computing has applications such as ambulatory medicine (K. Banitsas et al., 2005; K. A. Banitsas et al., 2006; Kiselev et al., 2012; Pavlopoulos et al., 1998; Rosales Saurer et al., 2009; Zerth et al., 2012), diabetes management (Quinn et al., 2011; Ribu et al., 2013; Skrovseth et al., 2012; Spat et al., 2013), asthma management (Finkelstein et al., 1998; Gupta et al., 2011), control of obesity (Patrick et al., 2009), smoking control (Ghorai et al., 2014; Ybarra et al., 2014), seizure management (Pandher et al., 2014), stress management (Clarke et al., 2014) and treatment of depression (Burns et al., 2011) among others. In the field of mHealth the majority of applications are for fitness (43%) followed by health resource (15.0%) and diet/caloric intake (14.3%,), while the user angagement has the form of self-monitoring and training (74.8%) (Sama et al., 2014); in contrast, despite there are applications targeting patinets, currently, there are rather limited applications targeting physicians and doctor-patient interactions (T. Martin, 2012). Pioneering field seems to be radiology consultation for X-rays and mostly Computer Tomography (Choudhri et al., 2012; Choudhri et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2012; Toomey et al., 2010) and ECG transmission (Vaisanen et al., 2003). The applications are very limited in the fields of pathology and even less in cytopathology despite both specialties deal with images. In relation to pathology, the most reported uses of handhelds, are limited to experimental endeavors in education and telemedicine (Park et al., 2012). For cytopathology, even after a thorough search, there were not found published articles or reports. However, pathology and cytopathology share many common characteristics. Actually, in most countries, cytopathology is considered as a subspecialty of pathology. Thus concepts and ideas can be useful to both specialties; therefore applications can be transferred from one domain to the other.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset