Impacts of Remediation of Halogenated Organic Compounds in Soils and Sediments

Impacts of Remediation of Halogenated Organic Compounds in Soils and Sediments

Hale Demirtepe
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1241-8.ch016
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Halogenated hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) have been used in various industrial applications and are present in many commercial products. Due to their emissions during manufacturing and discharges as wastes, halogenated HOCs such as polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers are ubiquitously found in the environment and create contaminated sites. To remove the contamination from these sites, various remediation techniques have been useful. The purpose of this chapter is to investigate the impacts of traditional and emerging remediation techniques on ecosystem. One of the traditional remediation techniques is dredging and the mostly studied emerging remediation techniques are bioaugmentation and biostimulation. The efficiency of these techniques is also evaluated regarding reduction in contaminant mass. Overall, this chapter presents the efficiency and possible impacts of dredging, bioaugmentation and biostimulation of soils and sediments, and the implications include the evaluation of most feasible remediation techniques by using life cycle assessment.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Halogenated hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) have been produced and used in various industrial applications due to their appealing properties such as chemical and physical stability. They were released into the environment due to their emissions during manufacturing and from products, discharges as wastes and unintentional production. They tend to partition in the organic-rich solid phase, i.e. soils and sediments, and constitute the contaminated sites. After the recognition of the contaminated sites problem, remediation techniques have been deemed as promising solutions. Predominantly used remediation techniques are environmental dredging, capping and monitored natural attenuation (Perelo, 2010; Sowers & May, 2013).

Environmental dredging is the mechanical removal of sediments, hence it may create resuspension of sediments and release of contaminants into water, which can affect the ecosystem. Realization of adverse impacts of dredging directed the remediation efforts towards in situ bioremediation, such as bioaugmentation and biostimulation. Both techniques rely on microbial transformation of pollutants in soils and sediments. They are applied to enhance the intrinsic biotransformation of contaminants. Enhancement of biotransformation can be achieved via addition of microorganisms (Payne, Ghosh, May, Marshall, & Sowers, 2019), nutrients (Chen, Zhou, Wang, Zhu, & Tam, 2015), electron donors (Qiu et al., 2012), surfactants (Huang, Chang, & Lee, 2014), and zerovalent iron (Keum & Li, 2005). It is essential to investigate the effects of these amendments in the environment regarding both the efficiency of bioremediation and the impacts on the natural status of soils and sediments. Plausible solutions should be evaluated before application of these techniques in contaminated sites.

The aim of this chapter is to investigate the efficiency and possible impacts of traditional and emerging remediation techniques applied to soils and sediments contaminated with halogenated HOCs. Halogenated HOCs, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are selected for this evaluation since they are widely studied in the literature and they have similar molecular structure. The remediation techniques evaluated in this chapter are dredging, biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Previous review studies discussed the advantages and disadvantages of traditional and emerging remediation techniques (e.g. Perelo, 2010). Overall, the dredging has been applied in many sites, and the data collected has been evaluated in terms of effectiveness and impacts (Bridges et al., 2008; National Research Council, 2007). However, since biostimulation and bioaugmentation have not been extensively applied in field, their possible impacts have not been studied in detail. Hence, this chapter, as a new contribution to the literature, compiles the findings of the recent studies on impacts of bioremediation techniques to evaluate them with that of traditional techniques. Furthermore, as the implication of this evaluation, the use of life cycle assessment is discussed regarding the selection of the most efficient remediation technique with the least impact to be implemented in the contaminated site.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Contaminated Site: Sites having high concentrations of hazardous pollutants which pose risks to human health and the environment.

Environmental Dredging: Mechanical removal of soils and sediments to remove the contaminated parts.

Life Cycle Assessment: A tool to analyze and evaluate the burdens of a product or an activity covering its all life cycle.

Biostimulation: Addition of materials to enhance the growth and activity of indigenous microorganisms in a contaminated site.

Bioaugmentation: Addition of microorganisms to contaminated sites where microbial activity is limited or absent.

Biotransformation: The process of microbial degradation of organic chemicals.

Hydrophobicity: The tendency of an organic compound to partition in organic-rich media rather than water phase.

Remediation: The activities to control, reduce and remove the contamination, aiming at reducing the risk to human health and the environment.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset