Indigenous Women in Academia: Reflections on Leadership

Indigenous Women in Academia: Reflections on Leadership

Bronwyn Fredericks (The University of Queensland, Australia), Tracey Bunda (The University of Queensland, Australia), and Abraham Bradfield (The University of Queensland, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8257-5.ch003
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Despite increasing numbers of Indigenous women within Australian universities, Indigenous academics continue to face barriers that obstruct promotions to senior leadership positions. Reflecting on a capacity-building program run by and for Indigenous women, the authors explore Indigenous peoples' responses to institutional racism. The authors consider how leadership is synonymous with resistance and misguided characterisations of Indigenous people and scholarship. They demonstrate that leadership emerges out of culturally safe spaces conducive to communal and reciprocal learning. Providing participants with the tools and mentorship needed to progress within the academy, they can acquire the support and confidence needed to push back to oppressive structures. Indigenous academics continue to engage their sovereignty and forge their own spaces. The authors argue that greater leadership is needed by universities whose policies and governance structures have the ability and power to further promote Indigenous peoples to leadership positions and build capacity amongst emerging leaders.
Chapter Preview
Top

Indigenous Women In The Academy

Indigenous academic and professional staff continue to be underrepresented across all levels of higher education comprising just 0.3% of the entire workforce (Thunig and Jones, 2021). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander staff are less likely to be employed in fulltime positions (Coates et al. 2021) with fewer Indigenous academics receiving tenure (51% compared to 58.4% for non-Indigenous staff) (Thunig and Jones, 2021). Lack of ongoing appointments can compromise job security as well as the stability needed to address gaps in higher education. Bunda and colleagues (Bunda et al., 2012) for example have written on how statistics can be misleading, highlighting that while the appointment of 2,000 Indigenous staff nationwide may appear progressive on paper, when the type of appointments are taken into consideration it equates to just 266 fulltime positions.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset