Infrastructure Governance at Sub-National Level: The Case of Kampala City in Uganda

Infrastructure Governance at Sub-National Level: The Case of Kampala City in Uganda

Kareem Buyana (Uganda Management Institute, Uganda) and Shuaib Lwasa (Makerere University, Uganda)
Copyright: © 2017 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-1645-3.ch015
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

Although infrastructure-dependent services are increasingly provided through subnationalised forms of authority, the current discourse largely focuses on financing challenges at national to regional scales. This macro outlook of infrastructure governance assumes that, once central government agencies have drawn partnerships with intergovernmental counterparts, followed by financing to subnational agencies, municipal authorities will be in a position to implement projects that respond to the differing needs of urban residents. This obscures the multi-layered nature of infrastructure governance at municipal level intercepted by gender differences in end-user needs across urban sectors. The chapter presents the challenges faced by Kampala city in Uganda, in the context of not only formalized infrastructure governance, but also non-statist forms of authority and informal practices that give center stage to the agency of men relative to women in altering local service provision dynamics to the benefit of their needs and expectations.
Chapter Preview
Top

Defining The Infrastructure-City Governance Nexus

Infrastructure – more specifically transport, sanitation, water, and recreation facilities – is essential to all realms of livability and sustainable city management. This chapter focuses on the conceptual elements that characterize the relationship between infrastructure and governance, in the context of subnationalized forms of authority, particularly municipal agencies, whose ideological orientation and mandate is to implement projects with oversight and financing from central government agencies. The chapter views governance as the institutions, mechanisms, and processes, within and outside government structures, through which economic, political, and administrative authority is exercised. This definition builds on literature arguing that governance has gone beyond the statist understanding to include forms of authority that make the city work beyond (or sometimes despite) the modern state (Frangoudes, Marugán-Pintos, & Pascual-Fernández, 2008; Fung, 2006; Johnson & Osborne, 2003; Pestoff, Brandsen, & Verschuere, 2013). Indeed, this denotes a transgressive account of governance, in which those who supposedly adhere to laws and policies inadvertently shape the link between policy and public action, by demonstrating alternative solutions to the multiple causes and consequences of deficiencies in infrastructure and service provision. This form of transgressive governance is characterized by efforts that challenge but also complement traditional state-centered forms of policy implementation – such as non-state forms of authority that operate urban service delivery through neighborhood groups, citizen coalitions, associations of informal transport operators, federations of city traders, and associations of waste collectors and drain cleaners citations needed (Engqvist and Lantz 2008). Focusing on the daily practices of these non-state actors within the context of sub-national governance, urban scholars have highlighted the multiple ways in which non-state practices articulate (or not) with formalized norms, regulations, and policy instruments.

For example, access to public space in Bogotá is the result of negotiation and “co-regulation” by the association of operators and government organizations, accompanied by professionalization of informal operators (Heinrichs, Goletz, & Lenz, 2016). In Kibera, Kenya’s largest urban slum, youth-based associations empowered citizens to use GPS technology to collect data and plot infrastructure-related challenges, then used the collected information to influence policy and development by advocating for their needs (Graesholm, 2012). In Kampala, Uganda’s capital and largest city, Buyana and Lwasa (2011) found that low-income neighborhood groups took the initiative to extract and add value to materials from the waste stream, thereby illustrating the gradual shift from dependency on municipal councils to neighborhood interdependencies in the management of urban waste.

This chapter seeks to draw from these transgressive articulations of governance and their unregulated practices to situate infrastructure governance at the subnational level within informal settings. The emphasis is on how informal practices of transport services, recreation, sanitation, and physical-space use emerge, and their link to women’s relative to men’s utilization of infrastructure in meeting commercial and domestic needs. Using evidence from Kampala city in Uganda, the chapter analyzes transgressive practices amongst municipal authorities, where city administrators make informal decisions to the benefit of their technical teams and political constituencies, and finally it demonstrates how this shapes the planning and implementation of infrastructure projects.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Transgression: A socio-political process through which those who are supposedly the adherers to laws and policies inadvertently shape the link between policy and public action by demonstrating alternative solutions to the multiple causes and consequences of infrastructure and service provision deficiencies.

(In)formality: Inclusive and systemic change whereby regulated and unregulated practices co-exist to foster collaboration between statist and non-statist/informal actors in altering local infrastructure provision dynamics.

Infrastructure: The technical and social aspects of designing, installation, and maintenance of transport, sanitation, water, recreation, and other urban facilities.

Governance: Institutions, mechanisms, and processes –within and outside government structures –through which economic, political, and administrative authority is exercised.

Gender: The utilization of infrastructure that is socially conditioned by differentials in the daily routines of women relative to men, which are based on the social differentiations in their domestic and commercial roles.

Transgressive Governance: Socio-political efforts that challenge but also complement traditional state-centered forms of policy implementation, by giving visibility to non-state forms of authority that operate urban service delivery through neighborhood groups, citizen coalitions, associations of informal transport operators, federations of city traders, and associations of waste collectors and drain cleaners.

Infrastructure Governance: The multiple ways in which state and non-state practices articulate– or not – with formalized norms, regulations, and policy instruments for the delivery of transport, sanitation, water, recreation, and other urban facilities.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset