Learning-Based Planning

Learning-Based Planning

Sergio Jiménez Celorrio (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain) and Tomás de la Rosa Turbides (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain)
Copyright: © 2009 |Pages: 5
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-849-9.ch151
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


Automated Planning (AP) studies the generation of action sequences for problem solving. A problem in AP is defined by a state-transition function describing the dynamics of the world, the initial state of the world and the goals to be achieved. According to this definition, AP problems seem to be easily tackled by searching for a path in a graph, which is a well-studied problem. However, the graphs resulting from AP problems are so large that explicitly specifying them is not feasible. Thus, different approaches have been tried to address AP problems. Since the mid 90’s, new planning algorithms have enabled the solution of practical-size AP problems. Nevertheless, domain-independent planners still fail in solving complex AP problems, as solving planning tasks is a PSPACE-Complete problem (Bylander, 94). How do humans cope with this planning-inherent complexity? One answer is that our experience allows us to solve problems more quickly; we are endowed with learning skills that help us plan when problems are selected from a stable population. Inspire by this idea, the field of learning-based planning studies the development of AP systems able to modify their performance according to previous experiences. Since the first days, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been concerned with the problem of Machine Learning (ML). As early as 1959, Arthur L. Samuel developed a prominent program that learned to improve its play in the game of checkers (Samuel, 1959). It is hardly surprising that ML has often been used to make changes in systems that perform tasks associated with AI, such as perception, robot control or AP. This article analyses the diverse ways ML can be used to improve AP processes. First, we review the major AP concepts and summarize the main research done in learning-based planning. Second, we describe current trends in applying ML to AP. Finally, we comment on the next avenues for combining AP and ML and conclude.
Chapter Preview


The languages for representing AP tasks are typically based on extensions of first-order logic. They encode tasks using a set of actions that represents the state-transition function of the world (the planning domain) and a set of first-order predicates that represent the initial state together with the goals of the AP task (the planning problem). In the early days of AP, STRIPS was the most popular representation language. In 1998 the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) was developed for the first International Planning Competition (IPC) and since that date it has become the standard language for the AP community. In PDDL (Fox & Long, 2003), an action in the planning domain is represented by: (1) the action preconditions, a list of predicates indicating the facts that must be true so the action becomes applicable and (2) the action post-conditions, typically separated in add and delete lists, which are lists of predicates indicating the changes in the state after the action is applied.

Before the mid ‘90s, automated planners could only synthesize plans of no more than 10 actions in an acceptable amount of time. During those years, planners strongly depended on speedup techniques for solving AP problems. Therefore, the application of search control became a very popular solution to accelerate planning algorithms. In the late 90’s, a significant scale-up in planning took place due to the appearance of the reachability planning graphs (Blum & Furst, 1995) and the development of powerful domain independent heuristics (Hoffman & Nebel, 2001) (Bonet & Geffner, 2001). Planners using these approaches could often synthesize 100-action plans just in seconds.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Derived Predicate: Predicate used to enrich the description of the states that is not affected by any of the domain actions. Instead, the predicate truth values are derived by a set of rules of the form if formula(x) then predicate(x).

Control Rule: IF-THEN rule to guide the planning search-tree exploration.

Online Learning: Knowledge acquisition during a problem-solving process with the aim of improving the rest of the process.

Search Control Knowledge: Additional knowledge introduced to the planner with the aim of simplifying the search process, mainly by pruning unexplored portions of the search space or by ordering the nodes for exploration.

Domain Independent Planner: Planning system that addresses problems without specific knowledge of the domain, as opposed to domain-dependent planners, which use domain-specific knowledge.

Plateau: Portion of a planning search tree where the heuristic value of nodes is constant or does not improve.

Macro-Action: Planning action resulting from combining the actions that are frequently used together in a given domain. Used as control knowledge to speed up plan generation.

Policy: Mapping between the world states and the preferred action to be executed in order to achieve a given set of goals.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: