“My Regular Pharmacy”: A Study on the Evaluative Criteria Consumers Use in Selecting an Independent Community Pharmacy as Their Regular One

“My Regular Pharmacy”: A Study on the Evaluative Criteria Consumers Use in Selecting an Independent Community Pharmacy as Their Regular One

Νiki Glaveli
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-5442-5.ch009
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The objectives of this chapter are (1) to develop an instrument that incorporates the core attributes of evaluative criteria that are used by patients/customers in selecting and repeatedly visiting a community pharmacy, (2) to analyze the proposed attributes in order to put forward valid dimensions of evaluative criteria, and (3) to assess the reliability of this instrument. The selection criteria incorporated in the final list were selected based on an extensive literature review and on experts' and customers' opinions. To collect the data, a survey was conducted in the area of Macedonia, Greece. In total, 223 questionnaires were collected. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factor structure of the proposed instrument namely: price, availability of products, staff competence, and pharmaceutical care services. Moreover, reliability was assessed through Cronbach's alpha coefficient and average variance extracted. The current study outcomes can guide pharmacists' strategic actions in boosting customer patronage behavior in the highly competitive pharmaceutical sector.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Deregulation, cost-containment policies across EU and the broader role of pharmacies in public health promotion, therapeutic/medication management and patient counseling, are the main factors that have altered the pharmaceutical industry’s landscape, heightened competition and increased the importance of adopting customer-centered strategies to attract and retain the customer (Castaldo, Grosso, Mallarini, & Rindone, 2016).

The deep recession of the Greek economy in the last decade (2010 onwards) has triggered even more radical reforms in the Greek pharmaceutical market with the intention to rationalize the licensing, pricing and reimbursement systems for medicines. Liberalization of the pharmacist’s profession, increases in rebates to social security funds, reduction in regulated wholesale, the enforcement of electronic prescriptions and the prescription of the active substance rather than the brand, are probably the most notable changes in the sector (Vozikis, Stavropoulou, & Patrinos, 2015; Kevrekidis, Minarikova, Markos, Malovecká, & Minárik, 2018). These developments have shrunk the sales of pharmaceutical products though community pharmacies by 41.2% in the period 2009-2018 (sales dropped from 6.8 to 4.0 billion euros; Health Economics Observatory of IOBE and Hellenic Association of Pharmaceutical Companies, 2019), reduced profit margins and intensified competition amongst independent community pharmacies. The picture gets even worse if one considers the population density of pharmacies in Greece, which is the highest among EU member states. More precisely, the ratio in 2017 was 97 pharmacies per 100,000 inhabitants (1:1030), whilst the EU-28 average is 31 pharmacies per 100,000 inhabitants (1: 3226 ; Health Economics Observatory of IOBE and Hellenic Association of Pharmaceutical Companies, 2019).

Based on the above facts and data it becomes apparent that within the competitive pharmacy market environment, independent community pharmacies are required to understand the factors that influence consumers’ choice of a pharmacy in order to develop the strategies and the range of quality (often niche) services required to attract, satisfy and retain their customers. Responding to this prerequisite, the objectives of this chapter are set as follows: (i) to develop an instrument that incorporates the core attributes of evaluative criteria that are used by patients/customers in selecting and repeatedly visiting a community pharmacy, (ii) to analyze the proposed attributes in order to put forward dimensions of evaluative criteria and (iii) to assess the reliability of this instrument.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Community Health Promoter: The extent to which the pharmacy is involved in the community.

My Regular Pharmacy: The repeatable use of a pharmacy for obtaining medicines and other type of products such as: health, beauty, baby care ones.

Triangulation: The process of combining theoretical perspectives (theoretical triangulation), or data from different sources (data triangulation), or methods to conduct a study (methodological triangulation) or multiple investigators/researchers (investigator triangulation) to study a specific social phenomenon.

Medicines Supplier: A pharmacy’s central role associated with the provision of prescription and over-the- counter medicines.

Advice Provider: A pharmacy’s role associated with the provision of medication advice and treatment of minor ailment.

Community Pharmacy: They are the most accessible pharmacies to the patients. They supply medicines, counsel patients, and participate in health-promotion programs. Also, they maintain links with other health professionals in primary health care.

Reprofessionalize: Re-establish the standing of a profession.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset