Next-Generation Optical Access Networks

Next-Generation Optical Access Networks

Martin Lévesque (Optical Zeitgeist Laboratory, Canada), Liviu Ivănescu (Optical Zeitgeist Laboratory, Canada) and Martin Maier (Optical Zeitgeist Laboratory, Canada)
Copyright: © 2015 |Pages: 14
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch591
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Chapter Preview

Top

Background

Fiber access networks have in general one of the following three architectures: (i) point-to-point architecture, (ii) active star architecture, or (iii) passive star architecture.

In the point-to-point (PtP) architecture, each home or building is connected to the central office (CO) via one or two dedicated fibers. This type of architecture provides improved privacy and ease of service upgrade for individual subscribers, but requires a large number of fibers and transceivers since network equipment is not shared among subscribers. As a consequence, footprint and power consumption may become serious problems at the CO.

This shortcoming is avoided in star architectures, where a single feeder fiber runs from the CO to a remote node, from which individual distribution fibers branch out to connect the subscribers. The feeder fiber carries all traffic of the attached subscribers and its cost can be shared among them. In doing so, the number of required fibers and transceivers at the CO can be reduced significantly. Depending on the nature of the remote node, the star architecture may be either active or passive. In the active star architecture, the remote node is an active device, e.g., Ethernet switch, and needs powering and maintenance. Conversely, in the passive star architecture, the active node is replaced with a passive optical splitter/combiner. Using a completely passive splitter/combiner at the remote node avoids the need for powering and maintenance and thereby helps reduce the capital expenditures (CAPEX) and in particular operational expenditures (OPEX) of fiber access networks (Koonen, 2006).

Due to their completely passive nature, PONs incur lower CAPEX and OPEX and also offer a higher reliability than active star architectures. Furthermore, PON outside plants provide transparency against data rate, modulation format, and protocol as the passive splitter/combiner is entirely agnostic to all of them. This transparency, apart from the huge bandwidth and low loss of optical fiber, is one of the most crucial features that eased carriers into deploying PON-based fiber access networks that are instrumental in minimizing deployment costs while maximizing revenues from new service offerings and can be flexibly upgraded as new technologies mature or new standards evolve (Effenberger, 2007).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Fiber-Wireless (FiWi): Advanced network with integrated fiber and wireless technologies.

Fiber-Wireless Sensor Network (Fi-WSN): FiWi network linked with sensors for the monitoring of key parameters.

Fiber-To-The-x (FTTx): Broadband network architecture using optical fiber to provide last-mile telecommunications.

Next-Generation Passive Optical Network (NG-PON): Evolutionary and/or revolutionary PON upgrade resulting in significantly increased capacity.

Passive Optical Network (PON): Point-to-multipoint network based on unpowered remote nodes used to serve multiple premises.

Smart Grid: Modernized electrical grid that uses advanced information and communications technologies to improve efficiency, reliability, and sustainability of the power grid.

Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPON): Legacy PON compliant with IEEE 802.3ah providing bidirectional 1 Gbps.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset