Nine Elements of the Scholarship of Discovery: A Starting Point

Nine Elements of the Scholarship of Discovery: A Starting Point

Marcia Devlin (Victoria University, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1001-8.ch005

Abstract

In this chapter, the focus is on higher education research or what Boyer has called the scholarship of discovery. The concepts of higher education research and the scholarship of discovery may have similarities or differences – such comparisons are not the subject of this chapter. The chapter outlines nine elements of the scholarship of discovery for consideration as a starting point and offers an example to illustrate one application of these elements drawn from the field of higher education research.
Chapter Preview
Top

Possible Elements Of The Scholarship Of Discovery

The elements of the scholarship of teaching, the scholarship of discovery, and educational research, have been variously described and articulated. The elements of high quality educational research outlined by Devlin (2008) over a decade ago include that there should be: appropriate preparatory groundwork; the formulation and use of clear research questions; ethical research conduct; the appropriate use of conceptual and theoretical framework(s); the use of relevant and appropriate methods and methodology and choosing the highest quality dissemination outlets.

More recently, the “principles of good practice in SoTL [scholarship of teaching and learning]” outlined by Felten (2013) include that the work is: focused on student learning; grounded in context; methodologically sound; conducted in partnership with students; and that it is appropriately public. While not focusing specifically on the scholarship of discovery, his thesis provides useful food for thought.

In this current publication, in discussing the difference between the essentials of scholarly teaching and those of educational research as a process, Ling P. (Chapter 3) suggests that the latter include: an investigation of a research question or questions informed by current understandings in education, and an appreciation of gaps and/or contentious issues; a systematic investigation aligned to a research paradigm; systematic investigation of the question at scale and across sufficient instances to warrant conclusions with a potential to contribute to current understanding; appropriate data generation or collection; appropriate data analysis; and evidenced, logical conclusion(s), specifying the contribution made to current understanding in education.

Devlin (2008) is focused on higher education research elements; Felten (2013) on scholarship of teaching and learning principles; and Ling P. (Chapter 3) on education research essentials. This chapter does not include a critical review of the literature to determine the definition of the scholarship of discovery. Instead, these three articulations, spaced over about a dozen years are used, to start a conversation about what the scholarship of discovery looks like – what its elements might be. The conversation starts by examining the elements (or principles or essentials) of the scholarship of discovery. To illustrate the elements found by these three scholars, focused on different aspects and looking for slightly different things, a case study of a small evaluative investigation undertaken by the author in the higher education context is used. Whether education research, or the scholarship of discovery, the aim is to provoke thought about the endeavour and the reasons for it.

The elements (or principles or essentials – hereafter known as elements) of the scholarship of discovery inherent in the three selected understandings are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1.
A comparison of three sets of elements of the scholarship of discovery
Elements of the Scholarship of DiscoveryDevlin
2008
Felton
2013
Ling
(This Book)
1. Preparatory groundwork / situated in context and literature /appreciation of gaps &/or contentious issues
2. Guided by research questions
3. Ethical research conduct
4. Students as partners
5. Focused on student learning
6. Theoretical/conceptual frameworks considered/ applied
7. Sound research design/methodology
8. Makes or has the potential for an original contribution
9. Appropriate public dissemination

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset