Ontology Learning in Practice: Using Semantics for Knowledge Grounding

Ontology Learning in Practice: Using Semantics for Knowledge Grounding

Irena Markievicz (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania), Daiva Vitkutė-Adžgauskienė (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania) and Minija Tamošiūnaitė (University of Gottingen, Germany)
Copyright: © 2014 |Pages: 14
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6154-7.ch009
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter presents research results, showing the use of ontology learning for knowledge grounding in e-learning environments. The established knowledge representation model is organized around actions, as the main elements linking the acquired knowledge with knowledge-based real-world activities. A framework for action ontology building from domain-specific corpus texts is suggested, utilizing different Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, such as collocation extraction, frequency lists, word space model, etc. The suggested framework employs additional knowledge sources of WordNet and VerbNet with structured linguistic and semantic information. Results from experiments with crawled chemical laboratory corpus texts are presented.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

Ontology-based knowledge grounding avoids problems with concept ambiguity and lack of semantic relations between concepts. The use of ontology enables the unification of different representations for the same object and allows easy data exchange between different systems. In this case, ontology can be interpreted as a concept database for formal development of information, preferences and knowledge (IPK) (Gadomski, 1999). The main idea of cognitive IPK architecture is the generalization of available data by applying information and preference relations for the choice of proper statements. Information categorization and prioritization is used in order to get explicit reasonable statements for a particular domain. In the Top-down Object-based Goal-oriented Approach (TOGA meta-theory), ontology is considered to be a goal-oriented and role-depended set of concepts (Gadomski, 1993). The TOGA descriptive knowledge is defined by relation rules, physical laws, theories and models, and its operational knowledge is expressed by algorithms, methods, instructions, procedures and actions.

The ISO 1087-1 standard (2000) defines a concept as a “unit of knowledge created by a unique combination of characteristics” (p. 2). It is language independent, but can be influenced by the context. Thus, the ontology learning process can be described by the following steps: a) selecting the knowledge object, b) learning information about this object – defining concepts, terms, and a set of constraints, c) defining rational criteria for the evaluation of learned knowledge d) documenting (Ushold & King, 1995).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset