Roadblocks and Expectations in the Process of Bosnia and Herzegovina's Accession to the European Union

Roadblocks and Expectations in the Process of Bosnia and Herzegovina's Accession to the European Union

Domagoj Galić, Dražen Barbarić, Ana-Mari Bošnjak
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9055-3.ch014
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The European Union (EU) and Bosnia and Herzegovina have a long and specific relationship dating back to the early 1990s and the break-up of the former Yugoslavia. While the EU didn't present itself in a flattering light during the breakup of the SFRY, after the Dayton Peace Agreement and post-conflict governance, it tried to impose itself as a factor of stability in the eyes of B&H public. The aim of the chapter is to present key elements, problems, and consequences of unsuccessful integration into the EU. After a short presentation of the chronology of relations between B&H and the EU, the authors aim to answer several questions. First, what are the main issues in B&H-EU relations? Second, who is responsible for the stalemate in integration process? Third, how successful is the EU conditionality policy towards B&H?
Chapter Preview
Top

1. Background

Bosnia and Herzegovina is an example of a state which stayed imprisoned by their own political system, which was envisioned as a temporary framework for restitution of peace. We can divide exogenous intervention in two phases, first is diplomatic and military pressure for the end of war and second is state-building process which continues to this day. Just after a peace agreement International community started process of the state-building by creating peace regime through “humble consociationalism” (Barakat & Zyck, 2009, p. 1075). Despite the diplomatic fiasco during the wars in Yugoslavia, later actions offered hope that EU can establish itself as a regional power in Southeast Europe. After the end of the wars, the EU tried to redefine its position in relation to the region, but also to the United States, which was a key, and probably the only truly influential actor in the area during the conflict. Some authors have interpreted the gradual withdrawal of the United States from Southeast Europe after the conflict as a way of leaving the region to a natural ally, which is the EU (Hadžikadunić, 2005, p. 23). Of course, there are other important actors in Western Balkans. There is Turkey with its traditional links with the Balkans through their common Ottoman past and the usage of religion that has severe repercussions in the region. (Koppa, M. E., 2021) Also, China’s increased economic engagement with post-communist countries in the Western Balkans in the last decade has added to the complexity of democratic consolidation in the region, with possible negative impacts on the established process of European integration of these countries. (Khaze & Wang, 2021) Of course, there are concerns about Russia’s resurgent presence in the Western Balkans and the impact this could have on European Union enlargement. Despite the fact that Russia’s economic presence is dwarfed by that of the EU, Russia has been very successful in taking advantage of its soft power and cultivating the perception that it is a crucial strategic partner that cares more about the region’s interests than the EU does. (Panagiotou, 2020) Recognizing the impact of these forces on the Western Balkans, it must be emphasized, however, that the focus of this chapter is primarily on EU-B&H relations.

Key Terms in this Chapter

SAA: Stabilisation and association agreement.

EU Enlargement: According to relevant authors, EU enlargement can be defined as a process of gradual and formal horizontal institutionalization of organizational rules and norms.

Enlargement Fatigue: According to relevant authors, enlargement fatigue implies expressing a completely negative opinion about enlargement in member states.

SAP: Stabilisation and association policy.

IPA: Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance; it is the main financial instrument of the European Union to assist countries in alignment with the standards and policies of the EU.

Conditionality Policy: The use of political instruments by one actor in order to shape the actions of another actor.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset