Social Connectedness and the Declining Life Satisfaction of Australian Females

Social Connectedness and the Declining Life Satisfaction of Australian Females

Jennifer Ulichny (Grey Space Matters, Australia), Christopher L. Ambrey (Griffith University, Australia), and Christopher M. Fleming (Griffith University, Australia)
Copyright: © 2015 |Pages: 24
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8611-3.ch010
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


Research into subjective well-being suggests that happier people are healthier and more professionally productive, achieve goals more easily and are more often successful in personal relationships. Unfortunately, studies in the USA and Britain suggest that there has been an overall decline in self-reported well-being since the 1970's, particularly for females. Data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey appear to corroborate the international evidence. Using HILDA 2001 to 2011 data, this chapter investigates: levels of life satisfaction; association between life satisfaction and social connectedness; and whether declines in life satisfaction can be explained by declines in social connectedness. A positive association is found between life satisfaction and almost all measures of social connectedness for both genders. This association, however, only partly explains observed declines in life satisfaction. This research emphasises the importance of frequent, meaningful social connections and the urgency for governments to address declining well-being.
Chapter Preview


The desire to thrive and progress within a meaningful life is not a recent concept. Buddhism has promoted inner peace and mental well-being for over 2,500 years and in ancient Greece, Aristotle’s idea of eudaimonia, or ‘human flourishing’ was held as the ultimate goal, achieved only by giving oneself up entirely to the superior activities of knowledge and virtue (Vivenza, 2007). Across a range of academic disciplines well-being is defined in varying complexities: from the realisation of bare necessities and functional health, through fulfilling relationships and hedonic pleasures, to realising one’s ‘higher purpose’ – or a complex amalgamation of all of these (Diener, 2000; Frey & Stutzer, 2002; Malthus, 1798; Ryan & Deci, 2001). Today, research into subjective well-being (i.e. wellbeing indicators based on personal opinions, interpretations, points of view, emotions and judgment) suggests that happier people tend to be more productive in their professional life, are more likely to be healthy with better immune systems and shorter healing times, achieve goals more easily and are often more successful in personal relationships (Diener & Biswas-Diener, 2008; Grant, Wardle, & Steptoe, 2009; Penedo & Dahn, 2005; Scheier & Carver, 1987; Tov & Diener, 2013).

Economics has traditionally shied away from the study of subjective measures of well-being, focusing instead on the concept of ‘utility’, most easily understood through a consumer’s willingness to pay for a preferred item and, therefore, presumably feel a proportionate increase in happiness thereafter (cf. Edgeworth, 1881; Jevons, 1871; McCloskey, 1989). Despite an inherent understanding that well-being is important and is more than just a ratio of utility to happiness, societies have moved away from using well-being to gauge national success, instead focusing on measures of market-based production such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

While the simplicity of GDP is appealing, and the movement of money is commonly presumed to gauge human progress, GDP does not necessarily indicate societal progress. Indeed, many countries with increases in GDP during the late 20th Century have found that their citizens report declining levels of happiness (Blanchflower & Oswald, 2004; Easterlin, 1995, 2009; Frey & Stutzer, 2002; Stiglitz, Sen, & Fitoussi, 2009). Despite this, economic growth continues to be reaffirmed as the highest priority among many world leaders and is enduringly and fallaciously regarded as being synonymous with progress and inclusive of development. At an individual level, the belief that comfort and positional goods will make one happier is often misplaced and neglects the phenomena of changing aspirations, hedonic adaptation and social comparisons. For these reasons, higher incomes and higher economic growth do not necessarily accord with greater happiness or well-being (Daly, 1987; Easterlin, 2003). Hence, both males and increasingly females spend much of their lives working to make money, at the expense of other life domains such as family life, relationships and health, even though attaining one’s goals in these domains has a more enduring impact on happiness.

The purpose of this chapter is to extend earlier work that reports declining life satisfaction for females in Australia and to investigate if perhaps a concomitant decline in social connectedness presents an explanation for this trend. In doing so, this study will investigate, over the period 2001 to 2011: (1) trends in female life satisfaction; (2) the link between social connectedness and life satisfaction; (3) how the link between social connectedness and life satisfaction differs between males and females; (4) how measures of social connectedness have changed; and (5) the degree to which declines in female life satisfaction can be explained by declines in social connectedness.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Work: Refers to activities undertaken by an individual to achieve a specific set of objectives. Can be paid, unpaid, daily or infrequent activities.

Hobby: Refers to an individual’s participation in any community-based activity, such as a club or recreational activity, sporting or other event.

Social Connectedness: Refers to an individual’s degree of both community participation and social cohesion. This term encompasses structural elements of social capital such as participation in community-based activities ( hobby ), the frequency of getting together with friends ( social interaction ) and cognitive components of social capital such as, the support provided or perceived to be provided by others ( tangible support ) and the perceived sense of the presence and closeness of friends and friendships ( sense of belonging ).

Life Satisfaction: Refers to an individual’s self-assessed feeling of fulfilment or contentment regarding their life as a whole.

Happiness: Often used interchangeably with terms such as life satisfaction, well-being or subjective well-being, refers to an individual’s positive feeling usually considered more temporary in nature.

Social Interaction: Refers to the frequency with which an individual gets together socially with friends and/or family that they are not living with.

Subjective Well-Being: The scientific term in psychology for an individual’s evaluation of their experienced positive and negative affect, happiness, or satisfaction with life. (They are separable constructs as explained by Frey and Stutzer (2002) ; nevertheless, the terms happiness, well-being, and life satisfaction tend to be used interchangeably within the economics literature.)

Tangible Support: Refers to the physical, emotional or financial assistance provided or perceived to be provided to an individual.

Sense of Belonging: Refers to an individual’s perceived sense of the presence and closeness of friends and friendships or their absence (loneliness).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: