Strategic Alliances and Knowledge Management Strategies: A Case Study

Strategic Alliances and Knowledge Management Strategies: A Case Study

Mario J. Donate-Manzanares, Fátima Guadamillas-Gómez, Jesús D. Sánchez de Pablo
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-783-8.ch605
(Individual Chapters)
No Current Special Offers

Chapter Preview


1. Introduction

The growth of alliances has generated considerable interest in this topic among both academics and practitioners. Strategic management literature has recognized alliances as a source for firms to acquire and improve their knowledge-based capabilities in current innovation-intensive environments (Oxley and Sampson, 2004). Thus, alliances can act as mechanism for firms to develop a competitive advantage over their rivals, outperforming them by means of the company’s proven access to economies of scope and scale, complementary capabilities and knowledge, the possibility of competing in new markets, the improvement of their learning capacity, or the sharing of costs and risks of R&D projects, among other reasons (Saxton, 1997; Ireland, Hitt and Vaidyanath, 2002; Luo, 2008).

Knowledge Management Strategy (KMS) constitutes one of the main factors in order for firms to achieve these objectives and build collaborative advantages through strategic alliances. Managing organizational knowledge in alliances involves working on the best possible strategic design to create, acquire, maintain, transfer and apply organizational knowledge developed or acquired amongst the partners in order to achieve competitive goals (Guadamillas, Donate and Sánchez de Pablo, 2006).

A clear relationship exists between strategic alliances and the KMS of firms. Lane and Lubatkin (1998) and Stuart (2000) contend the main objective of partners in a technological alliance is the inter-organizational learning, as a consequence of the difficulty faced by each partner in terms of solving their environmental problems internally. Inter-organizational learning is based on the absorptive capacity of the company, which represents its ability to value, assimilate and use the external (acquired) new knowledge (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990; Lane and Lubatkin, 1998). Absorptive capacity depends on the path-dependent investment in R&D and technology developed by the company, so the more innovative the firm is, the more likely it is to invest in alliances with a view to inter-firm learning. However, in order for such learning to take place, an adequate KMS has to be developed in order to effectively manage and exploit the flow of knowledge that is produced in the strategic alliance (Grant and Baden-Fuller, 2004). In doing so, this will speed up the development of innovation, thus making its implementation over a short period of time possible, ultimately leading to important advantages for the firm whilst encouraging a superior level of learning at the same time (Stuart, 2000).

It is also important to remark on certain key organizational and technical aspects related to the role of KMS in the management of strategic alliances: the use of information technology (IT) and the systems that make the access to knowledge easier, the organizational culture that fosters innovation development and ethical and responsible behavior, and human resources (HR) practices. All of these make the establishment of a coherent structure for knowledge management in strategic alliances a complicated issue (Schmaltz, Hagenhoff and Kaspar, 2004).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: